Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265695AbUAQFLv (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:11:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265928AbUAQFLv (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:11:51 -0500 Received: from linuxhacker.ru ([217.76.32.60]:49046 "EHLO shrek.linuxhacker.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265695AbUAQFLt (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:11:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:11:07 +0200 From: Oleg Drokin To: Brad Tilley Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Re: Possible Bug in 2.4.24???] Message-ID: <20040117051107.GC1967@linuxhacker.ru> References: <514iaqBeC5488S07.1074301468@uwdvg007.cms.usa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <514iaqBeC5488S07.1074301468@uwdvg007.cms.usa.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1694 Lines: 40 Hello! On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:04:28PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote: > > > Jan 16 11:50:43 athop1 kernel: I/O error: dev 08:15, sector 54128 > > > Jan 16 11:50:43 athop1 kernel: journal-601, buffer write failed > > > Jan 16 11:50:43 athop1 kernel: (device sd(8,21)) > > A device error happened (you see the "SCSI disk error : " message and > > "Additional sense indicates Internal target failure") which reiserfs > > could not handle. > > kernel BUG at prints.c:341 == reiserfs_panic(). > Does this mean that there is a physical or mechanical problem with the drive > itself? I do use Yes it does. > reiserfs as it's the best fs available for my purposes. Could the drive > attempt to write > outside its physical bounds? Move the arm right when it was instructed to go The sector for I/O error is 54128, which is somewhere withing journal (at the beginning of a disk). What was the problem inside of the drive is not very clear, as modern drives are sort of black-boxes. > left? I don't > understand how the drive could have an error w/o affecting the filesystem. Well, there was affect on filesystem - the write have failed. Also may be later that block was remapped, or that was internal drive's logic failure or something else like that. This journal block won't be used on subsequent mount (because transaction was not closed), but will be just overwritten. So even if its content was corrupted, reiserfs does not care. Bye, Oleg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/