Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp8878956imu; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:11:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XRB787NWJw0+Ho/DkMfCMhBObuIE8kjeXbxznNiRzA+fqmvIXFjMFzslXqF42o1x+Qy4hx X-Received: by 2002:a63:2222:: with SMTP id i34mr17054301pgi.83.1543968672835; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:11:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543968672; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aORBy5FC+Z+I0rkuZnwOp6yWn0LiTpItA1fVH/mwnQ/TnSZ+zj/WxxaDOmODO/LR+p qOEE+mrDXWbpUcApdh8OvH+qL+MaOs2kEAZT7w/Pb8wU8QQn3vZ0iHPrwjj80fOffNgs MZNNiOLkp78weViyoR7Y/2D4M3tOwXfI+nh+WnB0nG63dYRp/WVOtmd7rOrcqWniKuxD IXFXzKUw5bXSWxVqyO2gh+DNQeYDmdULPA9duJQfsDhu/p5EnOHpNbDJwDhisyp7YWXh xn3APS36EJPZiqGV0gLKbLT7GjABSQNcy0ighqVDpEKTZSMTUaHl0OBZVeXqQ+zQj4mM HhSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4IMgbyPZRM1M8P9MT0XsSftqwOaqBCpR9SPA/U7gTPw=; b=jxIXQAVRWDKDKDbEn+W3ve5ZJwRcWTnheAQWst+8fJbn/LZ2Ebce8Sdc2D9OnqtqCG FDn5zpgwR5NgodJZAnwCkCsV+lIb/nKjhh9Wlr5803/zcEZa9wpJuPwLbZhGhchcf20H 6pSnTWs9KvyjzpFVMKK8eQzemYBaMYk/QwLwXm7QQfJNU88jJfFrP5zraVvSJ2SzvSGn 8/a/GKmbfs5v25C2ABWod/Tb+sYTAR8AWa+3KCNbf2VzGoZqaHYZ26qowTJWrtsiLzaC 2iUFig1z2rR4bSJQ2CAoebzK8nFk6wa2/n/e2EfGRFtlHCcXYxFeht+YGF86/M6ByyRP xjkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d8si15133675pgl.386.2018.12.04.16.10.57; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726581AbeLEAJM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:09:12 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:11155 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725904AbeLEAJL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:09:11 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2018 16:09:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,316,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="280977033" Received: from jsakkine-mobl1.jf.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.24.8.183]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2018 16:09:11 -0800 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:09:10 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Roberto Sassu Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, david.safford@ge.com, monty.wiseman@ge.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] tpm: ensure that the output of PCR read contains the correct digest size Message-ID: <20181205000910.GE1233@linux.intel.com> References: <20181204082138.24600-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20181204082138.24600-7-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181204082138.24600-7-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 09:21:37AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > out = (struct tpm2_pcr_read_out *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE]; > digest_size = be16_to_cpu(out->digest_size); > - if (digest_size > sizeof(digest->digest)) { > + if (digest_size > sizeof(digest->digest) || > + (!digest_size_ptr && digest_size != expected_digest_size)) { > rc = -EINVAL; > goto out; > } Just noticed this but you must squash 4-6 because applying only previous commits will result a broken tree. It will be much bigger commit but won't be broken. I think you should also feed min_rsp_body_length as you should be able to precalculate. Last time I was asking why this isn't a bug fix. It is even for the existing code. The existing code should have a bug fix that checks that the received digest size so that it is the expected SHA1 size before we can apply this commit. /Jarkko