Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:14:17 -0800
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc:     zohar@linux.ibm.com, david.safford@ge.com, monty.wiseman@ge.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] tpm: pass an array of tpm_bank_list structures to
 tpm_pcr_extend()
Message-ID: <20181205001417.GF1233@linux.intel.com>
References: <20181204082138.24600-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
 <20181204082138.24600-8-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181204082138.24600-8-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 09:21:38AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> The new tpm_bank_list structure has been preferred to the tpm_digest
> structure, to let the caller specify the size of the digest (which may be
> unknown to the TPM driver).

Why is that? Didn't previous commit query these?

> +struct tpm_bank_list {
> +	u16 alg_id;
> +	u16 extend_size;
> +	const u8 *extend_array;
> +};

Naming is not good here. If this only for extending shouldn't that
be in the structs name?

/Jarkko