Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266121AbUAQUj7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:39:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266129AbUAQUj6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:39:58 -0500 Received: from mail.willden.org ([63.226.98.113]:47493 "EHLO zedd.willden.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266121AbUAQUjz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:39:55 -0500 From: Shawn Willden To: Mark Borgerding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: AES cryptoloop corruption under recent -mm kernels Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:39:36 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <40081AF0.5060907@borgerding.net> In-Reply-To: <40081AF0.5060907@borgerding.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200401171339.43800.shawn-lkml@willden.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 947 Lines: 27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 16 January 2004 10:10 am, Mark Borgerding wrote: > Thinking of it another way, this is equivalent to CBC mode having two > IVs: the first one being the sector number, the second a block of > zeros. Even simpler, conceptually, it's equivalent to prepending a block of zeros to every sector prior to encrypting. I'm not one to argue with Eli Biham (even second or third-hand), but it's really hard to see how this makes any difference at all. Shawn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFACZ2Op1Ep1JptinARAkzhAJ46cOO7JS0ccoid7aer7p+nZ1K2DQCbB3In JeIsagKKEsBaRiEZY+sElZ8= =ISsB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/