Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp9673022imu; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:29:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VuFFfKL2+Tjn/EcJ/iearDEBYYf9pLdItu9VYpdBe2om11kUhWitJWrc+y2xiNf+sKm4GD X-Received: by 2002:a63:f615:: with SMTP id m21mr21603698pgh.428.1544027342212; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:29:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544027342; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rvn66j70rtcndzdtWvkSQetCOR9iOSZjfNDQ1/7dPxZ4z2MlmdJNDxQ5gE3oHjooFZ uCHhGoS4+WJAd0P0J05CzL98Ak7FcuVSZdyKiBXeGlPXe6i1Ys/9NFWSkyo6Yr1+b7GK nGi5fZGMv9WP8w3sO8fBAMxKd21DOw60AvpQT8XvZTgecUKfXvMeTt1XW9GPvmLwzRtc 1QpGOo2tpkGL8ihijsOnOBKGrGz00gYU3e2ijjSPsVo/FseEHJX9i8SFUDXmcnzLcWBl ZZgHA+ASETMK7pxCB+q5BNUVARYiOEbG/+2E0SPbld25sM3mG6az94q+ow/R7vmdHIy8 Z+6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=hcuc9dp/H5uwlbzrtVWkhbyE/HLJWQrwzdBHtDxRfr0=; b=S8fBLIDghZuScrP0P4r+ItHxnvwjTDPAUTCd5DF4hJsueZXK7AaBvDwUt2RXqdS/6G 2XafMJrcVvRlkf9D/HZN76M63tpQDp/XqhOPzaaXn0VjRKXy+9bhQ68W1ISXFENF/5Rn nmlnZ0957mdWNSbx735ORJRlPBM2y6l6Q67ng67Th7PqSq39oGl18U7I5wRH6y7ueGnf dREGhukluUABo2e0VufZ4ogbOmKRzyUqbW0LKJgout7mJK3dW9ri+bjYS3TRsVdjSnXu Qhhl/Cp6V7kKG4NWsYiO9uf11sI86mQrRG7Vas4tpu9+YgNkNJ4Mc34yR8c+5C9Hper5 ka0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=DQjAxKcL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e11si18865493pgf.450.2018.12.05.08.28.46; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=DQjAxKcL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728398AbeLEQ1K (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:27:10 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:35580 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727979AbeLEQ1J (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:27:09 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id n9so9115625ioo.2 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:27:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hcuc9dp/H5uwlbzrtVWkhbyE/HLJWQrwzdBHtDxRfr0=; b=DQjAxKcL8UfL6LYkPg6EPYXThPrggV6zCMPmyQbEWgL1Vnu1k2aRDO8oNapvQHTr2/ JmmK3c7XAH7ga27pW70m88CR5uBiFq0kAjiTLeaY081LhZl69bykTqTt7icLSVi6IjgT zBs2jXJMa78eSJ5rBocUbdtqEUTnpdTEPMMw+ePjZqlsE0p6LhuhwyO6DycSBT4CMm8S +6rTqMxjAVwe3mNUuoBP3x02USLFFNoopsgMaKiI7hB8GIziaZqRpITFbcmf09witHpP KUIx90JEolmXP75vGoV2iy+3eHQHYg0MNi9tpfOmXR7ia0g12C+rUmRblL1uVxz8L1Ue k/LQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hcuc9dp/H5uwlbzrtVWkhbyE/HLJWQrwzdBHtDxRfr0=; b=uEt+EaFK+BWRGwvHajRKhVRFijUVe3WA9ESXGXil8TOXiiZ/CGa+6hHxRNclYDrVc3 cCBNWscRexxG7Tl0LDpYdX8dN/A0q0UDohCcM3zwcFQIbyOaotnQ6S3NPz9sNkWR2wGe W6CmTwXeZajNcgvoh/Wj7wjkzNeEUFSGGsgup7G7Q6SxzVTgjz6y/NnHEAfgEqpTI1TG 7IoDZF6j/YsS2DUBV0V1v8eIwe6JNBizDv7/D71CP/4/k1VxRWbEc1aUzZywUz7S/rar nh2/GoEdbKbj6m7tK7ynTNT4N+QDQUQJI1GeXjFyAW8Xzyb3NLATd268sgMW+w4Qc9P4 05WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbkoWy4ByC/fnaSaoQIVnjbeGElpEr/iwyNZchcil7p83O2K01W wfHIdefKwxLWDOE+E6Y0xS5X32Qg6eY= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:4a09:: with SMTP id w9mr22445165iob.260.1544027228198; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.56] ([216.160.245.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d199sm7237254itd.31.2018.12.05.08.27.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:27:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] blk-mq: refactor the code of issue request directly To: Jianchao Wang Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1543995842-20704-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> <1543995842-20704-3-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:27:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1543995842-20704-3-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/5/18 12:44 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote: > Merge blk_mq_try_issue_directly and __blk_mq_try_issue_directly > into one interface to unify the interfaces to issue requests > directly. The merged interface takes over the requests totally, > it could insert, end or do nothing based on the return value of > .queue_rq and 'bypass' parameter. Then caller needn't any other > handling any more and then code could be cleaned up. > > Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang > --- > block/blk-mq.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 153af90..fe92e52 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -1815,93 +1815,85 @@ static bool blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(struct request *rq) > return req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_WRITE; > } > > -static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, > +static blk_status_t blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, > struct request *rq, > blk_qc_t *cookie, > - bool bypass_insert, bool last) > + bool bypass, bool last) > { > struct request_queue *q = rq->q; > bool run_queue = true; > + blk_status_t ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE; > + int srcu_idx; > bool force = false; > > + if (!blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(rq)) { > + /* > + * Insert request to hctx dispatch list for 'bypass == true' > + * case, otherwise, the caller will fail forever. > + */ > + if (bypass) > + force = true; > + goto out; > + } Same here, of course. Otherwise looks fine. -- Jens Axboe