Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:29:26 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc:     Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
        Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= <arve@android.com>,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@google.com>, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: fix sparse warnings on locking context
Message-ID: <20181205162926.GA7185@kroah.com>
References: <20181203202457.228972-1-tkjos@google.com>
 <20181205105746.GA16376@kroah.com>
 <CAHRSSEyj8xsJk76r5Rinmor9szYHaca5nLATWgDvt4Vkq-NtQw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHRSSEyj8xsJk76r5Rinmor9szYHaca5nLATWgDvt4Vkq-NtQw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.0 (2018-11-25)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:02:22AM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:57 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 12:24:54PM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> > > Add __acquire()/__release() annnotations to fix warnings
> > > in sparse context checking
> > >
> > > There is one case where the warning was due to a lack of
> > > a "default:" case in a switch statement where a lock was
> > > being released in each of the cases, so the default
> > > case was added.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> >
> > You sent out 4 patches here, as a series, but with no numbering so I
> > don't know what order to put them in :(
> >
> > Can you resend them properly numbered so I have a chance to get it
> > right?
> >
> 
> I didn't number them because they are independent and can go in any order.

Ah, that wasn't obvious :)

> They are not really a series. I can resend with numbers though if you want
> to reflect the order I sent them in.

Ok, no need for numbering them, but they do need to be resent based on
the feedback I gave.  I've dropped them all from my queue because of
that.

thanks,

greg k-h