Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181202220847.24364-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <20181202220847.24364-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <85aa8e12-0bca-6432-e1a8-0faceff1dd5e@codethink.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <85aa8e12-0bca-6432-e1a8-0faceff1dd5e@codethink.co.uk>
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 23:15:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBDUxTc+ofCYm-zEeiFdU90U6DQOkX4B659q=MvRK64fg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] rtc: support for the Amlogic Meson RTC
To:     ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Cc:     linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
        alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, a.zummo@towertech.it,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        ccaione@baylibre.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Ben,

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:36 PM Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2018 22:08, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Add support for the RTC block on the 32-bit Amlogic Meson6, Meson8,
> > Meson8b and Meson8m2 SoCs.
> >
> > The RTC is split in to two parts, which are both managed by this driver:
> > - the AHB front end
> > - and a simple serial connection to the actual registers
> >
> > The RTC_COUNTER register which holds the time is 32-bits wide.
> >
> > There are four 32-bit wide (in total: 16 bytes) "regmem" registers which
> > are exposed using nvmem. On Amlogic's 3.10 kernel this is used to store
> > data which needs to survive a suspend / resume cycle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> > [resurrected Ben's patches after 2 years]
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>
> Just checking if the change of author is deliberate?
> not sure how to do >1 author on patches like this.
I changed the author on purpose after seeing how much I changed
(compared to your v4). this is also why I added you to the CC list
however, I left in your copyright (just like you kept Carlo's
copyright note) and MODULE_AUTHOR

if you're uncomfortable with this author change then please let me
know so I can undo it for the next iteration (which I need to fix the
issue found by the kbuild test robot).

in any case: thank you for your work on the previous iterations of
this series - that made life much easier for me :)


Regards
Martin