Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp10241080imu; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:34:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VcA9bFJJ7WLocnJ85asgA8jVXFsA0CwQmf6q03KIA9i33wpw460DKnuQxEYUOkgwWTvnLi X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8484:: with SMTP id c4mr26044609plo.59.1544067261060; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:34:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544067261; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H8NOqYiD0S+AK5O74zyLReHof0vjWqsaU7NOJF4uay6OJHajSdz91c9QPwiNGjSxdC vcdIGrvUqe6nF0AQZYRLoYik1z0CoNWVUVBlE9Ivz6WRbd6x2L5LFTzQFv9+kog3gEpo EaJBE6gspGtuAmV6ngVYzSL7+Aqc9uYZ2eL94M6f5QCd/dve7u1Hnt9+9+cRkASsm99g /WJ+hy16c+E69Qx7mpMX+plB6SmllnYRGqPV0jPbM5hSdPp1SjUuQ5rLJRFmOUj4Iu7U 9OnnD0VLTji9Vc/lK2rt/SXyEMyvkBTfJAIxUerLqvefLGC6ibg5vACXVd60/1GhfZEn WeIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=6pSTX+1ydBe5m+kCl5kqjBOCD9UV44kOkyFz6eqfKiY=; b=tXpTsze0RwBA7rEvEh4b9YbBfiTp5KD1wE0IwaqyK2IltC3yJO+D3hsePHNnP8fDll abpYZqoB5aJMpqPbQKiCo4kybhZ89xZqcydw5Owde5MTXwYULSQFVCSNyEnnuY1ZqVdf iBNgwxnGyMsm2URVSb5FuAGnpl2+oNwcbzVl3B1weTRpTBDFayrTx5yxGEiOA39P7Ohc J2I9G16uQBQoDLXVcxTNgQGDvpapTzxbOPUfcYVYYGYxVk9nxA7j37b4L+l6H+gMb8On 3blxeR4we2mLOa+o3qM9I2g8skTI/ThELh9vrMtXXyfmVyL+BCI+Eirc+YxI8CeMTRx/ kGFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2018-07-02 header.b=1mFXw3d4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4si21646795pls.34.2018.12.05.19.34.06; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:34:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2018-07-02 header.b=1mFXw3d4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728942AbeLFDd0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:33:26 -0500 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:37200 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728791AbeLFDdZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:33:25 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wB63Sat3121614; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 03:33:22 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=6pSTX+1ydBe5m+kCl5kqjBOCD9UV44kOkyFz6eqfKiY=; b=1mFXw3d41Q0nkVYWZM/UWtLTirI3H2gM14Wj5Ijak45sxxv/WZ8I5Su9ndiFaUtV5KLQ Okaf8JlDMvccd9RGcEasXRXnB5ybqyDxzEBcBe4j/F8VM10v/0I9OMhoBuJmNx8fjamb jeketJqDRhBjd/2kzlsPdSfnJkEb4/mRqhjfAFgufNwwPiydmruKVHExlps4qvRnhl87 KzBa/9hzlC1j+fujpQFawkAb/y93RGh9KTwLAVJerEZS22VJzr3/ARN8vdUf8lETFER7 EMfKY3csb01fhB8D3MbLi72tegKcK4qSNVfPMpuZX/Bf3F0xs0PnYEmmdtB1GL0UqogK Iw== Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2p3hqu5yyj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 03:33:22 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wB63XLBj003088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 03:33:21 GMT Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wB63XLRe014429; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 03:33:21 GMT Received: from will-ThinkCentre-M93p.cn.oracle.com (/10.182.70.234) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:33:20 -0800 From: Jianchao Wang To: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V10 0/4] blk-mq: refactor code of issue directly Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:32:36 +0800 Message-Id: <1544067160-20564-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9098 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=900 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812060030 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jens Please consider this patchset for 4.21. It refactors the code of issue request directly to unify the interface and make the code clearer and more readable. This patch set is rebased on the recent for-4.21/block and add the 1st patch which inserts the non-read-write request to hctx dispatch list to avoid to involve merge and io scheduler when bypass_insert is true, otherwise, inserting is ignored, BLK_STS_RESOURCE is returned and the caller will fail forever. The 2nd patch refactors the code of issue request directly to unify the helper interface which could handle all the cases. The 3rd patch make blk_mq_sched_insert_requests issue requests directly with 'bypass' false, then it needn't to handle the non-issued requests any more. The 4th patch replace and kill the blk_mq_request_issue_directly. V10: - address Jen's comment. - let blk_mq_try_issue_directly return actual result for case 'bypass == false'. (2/4) - use return value of blk_mq_try_issue_directly to identify whether the request is direct-issued successfully. (3/4) V9: - rebase on recent for-4.21/block - add 1st patch V8: - drop the original 2nd patch which try to insert requests into hctx->dispatch if quiesced or stopped. - remove two wrong 'unlikely' V7: - drop the original 3rd patch which try to ensure hctx to be ran on its mapped cpu in issueing directly path. V6: - drop original 1st patch to address Jen's comment - discard the enum mq_issue_decision and blk_mq_make_decision and use BLK_STS_* return values directly to address Jen's comment. (1/5) - add 'unlikely' in blk_mq_try_issue_directly (1/5) - refactor the 2nd and 3rd patch based on the new 1st patch. - reserve the unused_cookie in 4th and 5th patch V5: - rebase against Jens' for-4.21/block branch - adjust the order of patch04 and patch05 - add patch06 to replace and kill the one line blk_mq_request_bypass_insert - comment changes V4: - split the original patch 1 into two patches, 1st and 2nd patch currently - rename the mq_decision to mq_issue_decision - comment changes V3: - Correct the code about the case bypass_insert is true and io scheduler attached. The request still need to be issued in case above. (1/4) - Refactor the code to make code clearer. blk_mq_make_request is introduced to decide insert, end or just return based on the return value of .queue_rq and bypass_insert (1/4) - Add the 2nd patch. It introduce a new decision result which indicates to insert request with blk_mq_request_bypass_insert. - Modify the code to adapt the new patch 1. V2: - Add 1st and 2nd patch to refactor the code. Jianchao Wang (4) blk-mq: insert to hctx dispatch list when blk-mq: refactor the code of issue request directly blk-mq: issue directly with bypass 'false' in blk-mq: replace and kill blk_mq_request_issue_directly block/blk-core.c | 4 +- block/blk-mq-sched.c | 8 ++-- block/blk-mq.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- block/blk-mq.h | 6 ++- 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) Thanks Jianchao