Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262153AbUARRPR (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:15:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262164AbUARRPR (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:15:17 -0500 Received: from red-corpb4-7-68.telnor.net ([200.76.246.68]:24543 "EHLO pubserv01.bajawireless.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262153AbUARRPJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:15:09 -0500 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: License question To: David Schwartz Message-ID: From: Misshielle Wong Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:23:28 -0800 User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2266 Lines: 73 Hello On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:06:32 -0800, David Schwartz wrote: > > >> > Is it possile to include in the kernel distro some code with this >> > BSD-style license ? > >> Let me see > > Yes, in general. No, not this license. > Hahaha >> > - Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright >> > notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimers. > > Sorry, that's an "additional restriction" not permitted under the GPL. > This is no restriction. This here just asks for copyright notice and conditions to NOT be removed, which is perfectly fine. Section 6 never overrides this. Section 6 asks not to restrict rights, and above clause does not restrict rights. >> > - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright >> > notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimers in the >> > documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > > I believe this is an additional restriction as well. I find perfectly fine. Is just a request to include the copyright notice and conditions along with the binary. Section 2, clause c does not override. Does not infringe Section 6 either. What is the problem? > >> Mmmm... I think yes. Code in kernel must be licensed GPL. Above allow >> sublicense so ok > > They allow sublicensing, but the sublicense can't remove the additional > restriction. See section 6 of the GPL. > > To make this license GPL compatible, the two restrictions above would > have to be modified to be identical to, or a proper subset of, section 2 > clauses b and c of the GPL. > Hahaha, those are no restrictions, so no problem. Summarizing this license, it ends up like this: "Copyright bla bla bla. Keep 'em goddamn copyrights and disclaimer or else you have no rights to copy, modify, sublicense, redistribute, sublicense bla bla bla. Software provided 'as is'. Clear?" GPL is ok with that. > DS > > > -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/