Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp10285895imu; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 20:51:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VimDyFu7ZDvPCOetkIk4kIg/147nOPmw5cdJitFL0nlP3tB7h5JTE+Hux05zHlUYQVai2k X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7581:: with SMTP id j1mr27104938pll.308.1544071862280; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:51:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544071862; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BRyxLRU0kW2aGIG8zQACpBSarDb6/Ygf21Eg6S8DnDyoyNsZabLNJGvZeU4r1M3ZMS 2fafKVPijIcB1gFsZGnsHNJz4NaUytq3RPk14ChVjTXMgA/pU4plJF7Zh+B73Fz+atoz TvhgP+Uz6BWXPNk0DCsI/1S0K4XVeWGpzO+vHpiauRFgu676hvMjDoQj2wMh4y5qCNQ8 j2fNHj/qZlk+mtVe/epI7bQ36lIYtaNIVbksu7wH+and/OqgtfrGKw0VNd4x/aAajaSr yZGcgHBz1zyNaSjxLjJIFMeqUPLPFS8PIgTqZ2DE1QDydp8/hWakNI8tqD2bTiPYmcml 8ghA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=QSpec0NxNPvvuDulrxBr8SGe9exC1DQBYXTHqGFcd2I=; b=dLcr5w8WNQP8YjnGwJw1A+BFXKTIEPwAn3HP9BjsK/HMFH8rGfwSQc8YT4i+wjuMey FUhS71iYjcNlBGFlWUZeigIA+VQ4m//VtYea6ZTZHfe/AHGZK+OGx1ilHIcqx6Rd2b3q MMunNl5EOcpgmTznmJZiEBR3jjUVClX23oLL7tvUyzXilRI/yLDyUK3Qd8TGoaTj9X5b dGOGBHBcj28pKmeuMLQZ7JWVFdp46OLhFSAr9l5Wdb6BPXzYqOaNGJyRgMCC+qOarjdK o/smqaLfss02zO//ALtmn9dXWNoIiLZJnKT0zBugvMcCMuSmD+hAA1gkhVTw3kAuCxG4 8oZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si20861905plx.383.2018.12.05.20.50.45; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:51:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728980AbeLFEuA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 23:50:00 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:52128 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728156AbeLFEuA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 23:50:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::bf5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 658011457DBE2; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 20:49:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:49:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20181205.204958.1878018442106277817.davem@davemloft.net> To: pabeni@redhat.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, pjt@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: mitigate retpoline overhead From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:49:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Paolo Abeni Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:13:38 +0100 ... > This may lead to some uglification around the indirect calls. In netconf 2018 > Eric Dumazet described a technique to hide the most relevant part of the needed > boilerplate with some macro help. > > This series is a [re-]implementation of such idea, exposing the introduced > helpers in a new header file. They are later leveraged to avoid the indirect > call overhead in the GRO path, when possible. > > Overall this gives > 10% performance improvement for UDP GRO benchmark and > smaller but measurable for TCP syn flood. > > The added infra can be used in follow-up patches to cope with retpoline overhead > in other points of the networking stack (e.g. at the qdisc layer) and possibly > even in other subsystems. ... I like this a lot and unless I hear some objections I'm going to apply this series tomorrow. Thanks for working on this Paolo.