Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix return code and improve feature check for
 synthetic uevents
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     rafael@kernel.org, jeyu@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        msekleta@redhat.com
References: <20181205112745.12276-1-prajnoha@redhat.com>
 <20181205163044.GB7185@kroah.com>
From:   Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <a2ca5544-55d2-10d4-cc6e-a3554c84b341@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:40:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181205163044.GB7185@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Dňa 5. 12. 2018 o 17:30 Greg KH napísal(a):
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
>> Two small patches to aid handling of synthetic uevents back in userspace:
>>
>>   - Return error code back to userspace on /sys/.../uevent file write
>>     failure so userspace knows and it can act accordingly.
>>
>>   - Add new 'kernel/uevent_features' sysfs file to make it possible for
>>     userspace to check that the extended synthetic uevent arguments are
>>     supported without relying on kernel version check only.
>>
>> Peter Rajnoha (2):
>>   kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails
>>   kobject: add kernel/uevent_features sysfs file
> 
> Did you send this series twice?  Which one should I pay attention to?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

They're same, I just sent it again because I forgot to add the LKML list
with the first one. So please take the latter one with that list on CC.
Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
Peter