Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp10456407imu; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 01:09:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VdzTv23zwiFZh9K8QzdV1jWyylo70dSn8EsJDXSKwxu4usF4ciG1rp0ftePO99pKpMJF7t X-Received: by 2002:a62:848d:: with SMTP id k135mr27504843pfd.47.1544087379221; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 01:09:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544087379; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pMFeOVuT5Ox2I1a/ABoZ3QxIigbjtugk+6o1BRf5WdOGHxI2+vhr64uH/DbzmyBEw3 8yKJiC5HJ8xE/bSH+7NWEIadCZhU7CQk/9vhhsQgrjqqzqVUJlGPEc9rCt+00kw7VFL6 ONeaLOsJBjfnWWAI9W8niks4B18oHKNq8oL36h4Wfc9cSSfwKIYsyUkdGCu4eESsH3RY w9qYSTwj0wBawRJkiqpD88hPt62H0ce9xRD0JLxgFQcQ4XunuKhnkwAoTDGDjXEuF/zi JPrugeB9A5q+8APOYkEIgqRe3IaFOGmUav06FRE0lBREw00UGNQrt/rkVR5eDSwatvwl HGYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language:thread-index :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from; bh=jV9x8bL2oXiXdapZ93bXkDuQNhOxnzrxG36IKm2MHPM=; b=YsjStZy8S2z3kz/X9NQLtTIXYebUZe6LLiSESMNJsydM+YfH7P4OIf+ioDBktet6mT JbyEX0Mxtt0TdLlmMtGQr9yPiftAg68VgZ76vCbiPOj14tJXh7AcEQWppReU/U7QuFHA SxLAuv9hgfhAiUC3y3VNMM2jNsI48ZQaZQqL/1In5zCrOxIEF/Uc57Ix/K/j9ckxHPYU GbPq/C2qWUxgWJ5pe5oxeCZ3guB4XUgG1m6jfgKKGqqEZxeOI44c/qu45fmWNM/pOBUf wd+xUrB5nIohVbFxcDyxPhvRBO9dVHWSRwrIX0slWim1u8OQbaFFgudXbfttiDKVc3+Z OQiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c10si20642713pll.271.2018.12.06.01.09.22; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 01:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729177AbeLFJH0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 04:07:26 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:34640 "EHLO lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727575AbeLFJH0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 04:07:26 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse7q.lge.com) (156.147.1.151) by 156.147.23.53 with ESMTP; 6 Dec 2018 18:07:23 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151 X-Original-MAILFROM: chanho.min@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO WMRRD11NA101CK) (10.178.30.142) by 156.147.1.151 with ESMTP; 6 Dec 2018 18:07:23 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.178.30.142 X-Original-MAILFROM: chanho.min@lge.com From: "Chanho Min" To: "'Pavel Machek'" Cc: "'Oleg Nesterov'" , "'Ingo Molnar'" , "'Linus Torvalds'" , "'Linux List Kernel Mailing'" , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , "'Thomas Gleixner'" , "'Peter Zijlstra'" , "'Michal Hocko'" , References: <20181203074700.GA21240@gmail.com> <20181203115601.GA31795@redhat.com> <20181204091736.GD73770@gmail.com> <20181205143618.GA9535@redhat.com> <02a901d48d41$40aff110$c20fd330$@lge.com> <20181206085748.GA16059@amd> In-Reply-To: <20181206085748.GA16059@amd> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "exec: make de_thread() freezable (was: Re: Linux 4.20-rc4) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:07:23 +0900 Message-ID: <02b101d48d43$19ef85c0$4dce9140$@lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQIyDiMBIRrrGJHCkbd/uAm7qO0xxAFZXsAJAsWB798CKEutVQITr4gzAwLaDcsBvPt/0aRNkkqQ Content-Language: ko Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > I am sorry for the reverting this patch. It's also my fault that > > I didn't check lockdep. But, We decided to keep this patch in our product. > > Freeze fail is a real problem we've had for the last two years, > > whereas lockdep's notice is not a real problem. > > We hope this issue will be resolved soon. > > I guess it makes sense for your usage. > > How often do you see the failures without the patch? Very rare, it happens about 1 in 1000 suspends. Chanho,