Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 080/101] btrfs: Check that each block group has corresponding chunk at mount time
Date:   Thu,  6 Dec 2018 15:39:19 +0100
Message-Id: <20181206143016.797837482@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181206143011.174892052@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181206143011.174892052@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

commit 514c7dca85a0bf40be984dab0b477403a6db901f upstream.

A crafted btrfs image with incorrect chunk<->block group mapping will
trigger a lot of unexpected things as the mapping is essential.

Although the problem can be caught by block group item checker
added in "btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item", it's still not
sufficient.  A sufficiently valid block group item can pass the check
added by the mentioned patch but could fail to match the existing chunk.

This patch will add extra block group -> chunk mapping check, to ensure
we have a completely matching (start, len, flags) chunk for each block
group at mount time.

Here we reuse the original helper find_first_block_group(), which is
already doing the basic bg -> chunk checks, adding further checks of the
start/len and type flags.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199837
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.9: Use root->fs_info instead of fs_info]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -9896,6 +9896,8 @@ static int find_first_block_group(struct
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct btrfs_key found_key;
 	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
+	struct btrfs_block_group_item bg;
+	u64 flags;
 	int slot;
 
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, key, path, 0, 0);
@@ -9930,8 +9932,32 @@ static int find_first_block_group(struct
 			"logical %llu len %llu found bg but no related chunk",
 					  found_key.objectid, found_key.offset);
 				ret = -ENOENT;
+			} else if (em->start != found_key.objectid ||
+				   em->len != found_key.offset) {
+				btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+		"block group %llu len %llu mismatch with chunk %llu len %llu",
+					  found_key.objectid, found_key.offset,
+					  em->start, em->len);
+				ret = -EUCLEAN;
 			} else {
-				ret = 0;
+				read_extent_buffer(leaf, &bg,
+					btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
+					sizeof(bg));
+				flags = btrfs_block_group_flags(&bg) &
+					BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK;
+
+				if (flags != (em->map_lookup->type &
+					      BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK)) {
+					btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+"block group %llu len %llu type flags 0x%llx mismatch with chunk type flags 0x%llx",
+						found_key.objectid,
+						found_key.offset, flags,
+						(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK &
+						 em->map_lookup->type));
+					ret = -EUCLEAN;
+				} else {
+					ret = 0;
+				}
 			}
 			free_extent_map(em);
 			goto out;