Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To:     axboe@kernel.dk
Cc:     ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V11 3/4] blk-mq: issue directly with bypass 'false' in blk_mq_sched_insert_requests
Date:   Fri,  7 Dec 2018 11:09:44 +0800
Message-Id: <1544152185-32667-4-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <1544152185-32667-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
References: <1544152185-32667-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

It is not necessary to issue request directly with bypass 'true'
in blk_mq_sched_insert_requests and handle the non-issued requests
itself. Just set bypass to 'false' and let blk_mq_try_issue_directly
handle them totally. Remove the blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch check,
because blk_mq_try_issue_directly can handle it well.If request is
direct-issued unsuccessfully, insert the reset.

Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-sched.c |  8 +++-----
 block/blk-mq.c       | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index f096d898..5b4d52d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -417,12 +417,10 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		 * busy in case of 'none' scheduler, and this way may save
 		 * us one extra enqueue & dequeue to sw queue.
 		 */
-		if (!hctx->dispatch_busy && !e && !run_queue_async) {
+		if (!hctx->dispatch_busy && !e && !run_queue_async)
 			blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(hctx, list);
-			if (list_empty(list))
-				return;
-		}
-		blk_mq_insert_requests(hctx, ctx, list);
+		else
+			blk_mq_insert_requests(hctx, ctx, list);
 	}
 
 	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, run_queue_async);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 88ee447..3265e30 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1904,32 +1904,23 @@ blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
 void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		struct list_head *list)
 {
+	blk_qc_t unused;
+	blk_status_t ret = BLK_STS_OK;
+
 	while (!list_empty(list)) {
-		blk_status_t ret;
 		struct request *rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request,
 				queuelist);
 
-		if (!blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(rq))
-			break;
-
 		list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
-		ret = blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq, list_empty(list));
-		if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
-			if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
-					ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
-				list_add(&rq->queuelist, list);
-				break;
-			}
-			blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
-		}
+		if (ret == BLK_STS_OK)
+			ret = blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, &unused,
+							false,
+							list_empty(list));
+		else
+			blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, true, false);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * If we didn't flush the entire list, we could have told
-	 * the driver there was more coming, but that turned out to
-	 * be a lie.
-	 */
-	if (!list_empty(list) && hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs)
+	if (ret != BLK_STS_OK && hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs)
 		hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4