Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp344667imu; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 01:58:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/X1QYOvV78K+FT7bPQGux/Z3bE3MPsBOr/rt53WtqBV9TYK3+/EaN1+zGI602t311gqt61v X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ac8f:: with SMTP id h15mr1434238plr.245.1544176738677; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 01:58:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544176738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ukz7F45O1CHqmbPRRu7aeyzrEeKWP6MNZGaR+1JF2zydOktY47uxOLjNd+njxAkVdK KnDVorNEtHPDmXNSJupNZP63UzLzYBR0cli+QRNEvgQHQdIeDuKpOpemnKj+SmVuXjo2 GCNJ70L1fZntVnmxDPdBI38KKn/JlKHE6P8LUNY7bpm2UwU+82D7MdtR1Y+3rB4Lj9XD EXVTq1Hbrtu/opz8w1R6B2DPdTTv+cxi2fc9Vapg8EAxhsyaRl73sVfGdjwbKEZ+8SjN NwmsZ3/PiEqmBh4AVzj2JT/8cUoGAPtJ/Km/wreuAK4xxDDJuKpJ3myhTUz6FUlFod5E 2HIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=DZy6YRNacpqCtrpFxy1swYXvjsfwr5H+6euMY9izHCE=; b=dV8zBPsPmW2Zcii70KKjmQLJno0jz4CBBGr0TFGWxhFVHMnoArS5/MilqvfkUYgLfe s6StkPPjiR77OOUcwWgc6HtgigKe9obTAcKOLFFFA5PxtFF827ZXmhOUM6Sx04ZBmFDT arDqt47twqvD5BgOqrgE9/V0E2uQVlKDANtsbgKhDZULgGuU2uVroXAk0nxNLUDWex5u 7RMkuCt2Cr6ERkl3UdHlSL6Lgsb4WhZ5gax8mPupx2/A8TS33zEUtmMra6v9IMxJ+Tqh 3cIof02KD/n3U7XH8ONnQfjXJwUCdSsHVEEsOdNw6QD5z8XLltouhzclEfS3ddijk/OS sClQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q2si2437598plr.204.2018.12.07.01.58.43; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 01:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726054AbeLGJ5y (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 04:57:54 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58104 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725985AbeLGJ5y (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 04:57:54 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBFEAC3E; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E74851E0D9D; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:57:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:57:50 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Josef Bacik Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] filemap: kill page_cache_read usage in filemap_fault Message-ID: <20181207095750.GC13008@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20181130195812.19536-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> <20181130195812.19536-3-josef@toxicpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181130195812.19536-3-josef@toxicpanda.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 30-11-18 14:58:10, Josef Bacik wrote: > If we do not have a page at filemap_fault time we'll do this weird > forced page_cache_read thing to populate the page, and then drop it > again and loop around and find it. This makes for 2 ways we can read a > page in filemap_fault, and it's not really needed. Instead add a > FGP_FOR_MMAP flag so that pagecache_get_page() will return a unlocked > page that's in pagecache. Then use the normal page locking and readpage > logic already in filemap_fault. This simplifies the no page in page > cache case significantly. > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Thanks for the patch. I like the simplification but I think it could be even improved... see below. > @@ -2449,9 +2426,11 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > count_memcg_event_mm(vmf->vma->vm_mm, PGMAJFAULT); > ret = VM_FAULT_MAJOR; > retry_find: > - page = find_get_page(mapping, offset); > + page = pagecache_get_page(mapping, offset, > + FGP_CREAT|FGP_FOR_MMAP, > + vmf->gfp_mask); > if (!page) > - goto no_cached_page; > + return vmf_error(-ENOMEM); So why don't you just do: page = pagecache_get_page(mapping, offset, FGP_CREAT | FGP_LOCK, vmf->gfp_mask); if (!page) return vmf_error(-ENOMEM); goto check_uptodate; where check_uptodate would be a label before 'PageUptodate' check? Then you don't have to introduce new flag for pagecache_get_page() and you also don't have to unlock and then lock again the page... And you can still delete all the code you've deleted. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR