Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp355093imu; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 02:08:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XPes0vDS3Yj5ePIlSrjjJccYMVViuQeJkOwWdQQF3EMZOs1MLoNARVM0CbvXC1eutAso3o X-Received: by 2002:a65:4381:: with SMTP id m1mr1361616pgp.358.1544177314945; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:08:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544177314; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TKLI0yQoGlJ9h6izfzbIwXsX/qC/TipPww5eiI3Mj07Vhdp+JX/5XqOMULw1Er6jFS lSIJQLMBr+6CILeBnu/Qh5twPNhxtWRJ7mAU02g4k/FCKkYkGpWktsQW52kTRhry5XQH +tQWG88Ijl6+SH+Yp6GbEr0CHO+9k/Wq6uL3nMYTPC2HssBQAwLOE5Z4AN2vMZL6z61J pemcNldl2FBMwKVgT3E/CW7r9lIUauwxtfs5ekS4VVLMmQ2aJQm8ZsUdXKMOiJaa5ER5 XC77wHX1mPzKO62wxFIJSaBo0SIax8KzqL7qECDrulUBsqhvHopJzlk/mnB9xuBw9/wX s+/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=uB07GUZymK6cPX1ZrFE0fcpWl63Ntq7wHhbTYyl02b8=; b=0/j52xs5SNQIKuJVYjaBH0q4BDOrcnEgOEA/KONiAuUC4xAGL/d8wPSH4LPOf+zn/T vQghZCntFeWUfqse9gZyPqSw7Yka26O4IysH7unwAquR/vOjd4xs4vIss+1sGOgCM0fj k+t+7CJ9B1vaVUihA3LXoRulsQqmhCbTD3I8PqJpYEmCbxdd3IijOyYBDzc7SSfFg1OK mkFQonfj45GSOMChz8IymApvr2LBmiJmccfHjZAWUucYEHM0JUCQ536nzgk6fZD3ZnWo oHy/+REdtwQRQwnI9rmoawSpaetGWMInuRdyNFimflthiLE0sLdEPiVbiTuhxC7ApwR3 Ed3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n5si2419983pgl.485.2018.12.07.02.08.11; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726044AbeLGKH1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 05:07:27 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:37520 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725985AbeLGKH1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 05:07:27 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EB253EAFE43D6; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:07:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.202.226.41) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:07:18 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] scsi: hisi_sas: Relocate some code to reduce complexity To: Johannes Thumshirn , , References: <1544103284-100497-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1544103284-100497-3-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <2da87e22-1bbc-aff9-c0be-85a3fd8f4393@huawei.com> <778770d5-b377-2aaa-c2a0-9c548de74f17@suse.de> CC: , , , Xiang Chen From: John Garry Message-ID: <0cfe35c7-89c4-b65a-ba25-dfcf5d59a564@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:07:13 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <778770d5-b377-2aaa-c2a0-9c548de74f17@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.41] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/12/2018 16:20, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 06/12/2018 16:37, John Garry wrote: >> which is important. Let me know if you disagree and I can change it. > > Sure, it's your driver. It was just because the patch is even titled > "Relocate some code to reduce complexity", so I thought of reducing the > complexity for readers even further (like you don't need the line wrap > at 80 chars, and so on). > > Byte, > Johannes > I would rather not change if you don't mind. When we say "reduce complexity", we are talking about moving the DMA mapping code from the task prep function, as, when we add the DIX-related DMA mapping code, leaving all the DMA mapping code in the task prep function would make it a monster. Thanks, John