Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:27:34 +0000
From:   Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Cc:     gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
        khilman@baylibre.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        skannan@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        amit.kucheria@linaro.org, seansw@qti.qualcomm.com,
        daidavid1@codeaurora.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
        dianders@chromium.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, abailon@baylibre.com,
        maxime.ripard@bootlin.com, arnd@arndb.de, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] interconnect: sdm845: Fix build failure after
 cmd_db API change
Message-ID: <20181207162733.pdd62qvqzd6xk4nr@queper01-lin>
References: <20181207152917.4862-1-georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
 <20181207152917.4862-9-georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181207152917.4862-9-georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Georgi,

On Friday 07 Dec 2018 at 17:29:17 (+0200), Georgi Djakov wrote:
> Recently the cmd_db_read_aux_data() function was changed to avoid using
> memcpy and return a pointer instead. Update the code to the new API and
> fix the build failure.
> 
> Fixes: ed3cafa79ea7 ("soc: qcom: cmd-db: Stop memcpy()ing in cmd_db_read_aux_data()")
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/interconnect/qcom/sdm845.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------

IIUC this file is introduced by patch 5. Should the fix be squashed
into patch 5 directly ? Just to keep things bisectable.

Thanks,
Quentin