Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:21:38 -0500
From:   Kyle Williams <kdgwill@chromium.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Jack Stocker <jackstocker.93@gmail.com>,
        Michael =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niew=F6hner?= <linux@mniewoehner.de>,
        Nico Sneck <snecknico@gmail.com>,
        Tim Anderson <tsa@biglakesoftware.com>,
        Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@dk-develop.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: quirks: add NO_LPM quirk for Logitech
 Flare|Meetup|Brio|Rally
Message-ID: <20181207222138.GB161210@google.com>
References: <CAAd214WBzcsFamzqkdTp0AYDRo1=Uq1=Z5fJhzkOZ6znVFo3MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181205093902.GA18633@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181205093902.GA18633@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:39:02AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:38:25PM -0500, Kyle Williams wrote:
> > Description: Some USB device / host controller combinations seem to have
> > problems with Link Power management. In particular it is described that
> > the combination of certain Logitech devices and other powered media
> > devices such as the Atrus device causes 'not enough bandwidth for
> > new device state'error.
> > 
> > This patch creates quirk entries for the tested Logitech device
> > indicating LPM should remain disabled for the device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle Williams <kdgwill@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/core/quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> Along with what Alan said, this patch was sent in html mode, making it
> impossible to apply, and it was rejected by the mailing lists.
> 
> Please fix up your email client before resending patches.  Or just use
> 'git send-email'.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thanks for explaining why the patches were being rejected by the mailing
lists. I will move to using git send-email for sending patches and mutt
for sending replies in the future.

Kyle Williams