Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:09:22 +0100
From:   Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: x86_64: blacklist non-attachable interrupt
 functions
Message-ID: <20181208070922.GB2237@Dell>
References: <20181206095648.GA8249@Dell>
 <20181207234731.f52a8c1eff6c0e72c073ad40@kernel.org>
 <20181208010120.c3eda9042912068aecc68317@kernel.org>
 <20181207175805.GA1369@Dell>
 <20181208124859.7318e32abfab4cc6dc2da3a8@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181208124859.7318e32abfab4cc6dc2da3a8@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 12:48:59PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:58:05 +0100
> Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 01:01:20AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Hi Andrea and Ingo,
> > > 
> > > Here is the patch what I meant. I just ran it on qemu-x86, and seemed working.
> > > After introducing this patch, I will start adding arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist()
> > > to some arches.
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > 
> > > [RFC] kprobes: x86/kprobes: Blacklist symbols in arch-defined prohibited area
> > > 
> > > From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > Blacklist symbols in arch-defined probe-prohibited areas.
> > > With this change, user can see all symbols which are prohibited
> > > to probe in debugfs.
> > > 
> > > All archtectures which have custom prohibit areas should define
> > > its own arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist() function, but unless that,
> > > all symbols marked __kprobes are blacklisted.
> > 
> > What about iterating all symbols and use arch_within_kprobe_blacklist()
> > to check if we need to blacklist them or not.
> 
> Sorry, I don't want to iterate all ksyms since it may take a long time
> (especially embedded small devices.)
> 
> > 
> > In this way we don't have to introduce an
> > arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist() for each architecture.
> 
> Hmm, I had a same idea, but there are some arch which prohibit probing
> extable entries (e.g. arm64.) For correctness of the blacklist, I think
> it should be listed (not entire the function body).
> I also rather like to remove arch_within_kprobe_blacklist() instead.

OK. Thanks.

-Andrea