Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:24:34 +0000
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: john moser <bluefoxicy@linux.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: struct task_struct -> task_t
Message-ID: <20040119222434.GO21151@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <20040119221757.411BB3958@sitemail.everyone.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040119221757.411BB3958@sitemail.everyone.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 688
Lines: 15

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 02:17:57PM -0800, john moser wrote:
> It has come to my attention that in some places in the kernel, 'struct task_struct'
> is used; and in others, 'task_t' is used.  Also, 'task_t' is
> 'typedef struct task_struct task_t;'.
> 
> I made a small script to change around as much as I could so that everything uses
> task_t,

What the fsck for?  If anything, the opposite (and removal of that typedef)
would be preferable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/