Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2981889imu; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 14:14:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Vqmw98/awwmn24b/g+lfyXVYyQgMQkGazWRz6j0TD7ZbiNh+qLunvgE+AJ+jzqJE9Ke2C6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6185:: with SMTP id u5mr9829038plj.194.1544393642210; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:14:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544393642; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y2jX85AardShy2ushaK7KowAPPFtH347NiZxN+Tpey5PerHRpppHeuCe6HMnv+LsUy T7NeO7TGrScjMPzo7EVu2+xbMNmtDYXndyve9Te3jbGUJbQ8/1hsY0VVyIbASZDuLAaL lDBqjpPFCOB7RJ2pD8E8vXxdqq/Szcq9CGKXdZ9gwoTUbAc7gQHQB66+8Z0TA7hGxvaj kp1peKuxQwLRvKJ9ngv9jWeQvZvT8otiVi0Bg+skK9iWeX+pI2g///rYz8ymMeYvCBul NNg+gwG3160jGz1/8NAHFF08o+9BI4gLdUy6caKdtdLGremDCYCz7+JUIA9qdkBZBCiD AkMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=kbCJe4h7pJMrQKWLXVrjoHABhoIqMVOU/+ecBhWmw3M=; b=ef+KbiigJJjDBYHDK4kyPYNObVL08HDMEffmoKZsLeCEUnm5IupRJAcNo7zp4UuCmR BSkt5UfQ8zWCXDalxntTlHxDR07mAmHvPD27gbU/ADK0BDfJzjYg929+81Xum6iC9ffJ CP58AUmiQ4C0Q5fryfMxO78c15fRmwa/+zaoygzqLMMO9o2a4OmM+lw2zF4lMfa4bpNW 27BggT+nHhxZEaVQ7KvMLLsQwuTDZy1znhnRPs0sIK0+tUEv6+mc1kBXczn4DFi/VH35 siVdfSYNrq4HPYcGHLWEOQPrHI29RYyMt8U2oa+QG0gK9hXiYqpXY+8LWfcKYNUJG1T2 +Dew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e189si8604528pfc.202.2018.12.09.14.13.47; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728218AbeLIWLP (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:11:15 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:37656 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728207AbeLIWLM (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:11:12 -0500 Received: from pub.yeoldevic.com ([81.174.156.145] helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gW73O-0002iq-Iw; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:58 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72Z-0003Fx-Oc; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Takashi Iwai" , "zhang jun" Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 048/328] ALSA: memalloc: Don't exceed over the requested size In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.174.156.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Takashi Iwai commit dfef01e150824b0e6da750cacda8958188d29aea upstream. snd_dma_alloc_pages_fallback() tries to allocate pages again when the allocation fails with reduced size. But the first try actually *increases* the size to power-of-two, which may give back a larger chunk than the requested size. This confuses the callers, e.g. sgbuf assumes that the size is equal or less, and it may result in a bad loop due to the underflow and eventually lead to Oops. The code of this function seems incorrectly assuming the usage of get_order(). We need to decrease at first, then align to power-of-two. Reported-and-tested-by: he, bo Reported-by: zhang jun Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- sound/core/memalloc.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/sound/core/memalloc.c +++ b/sound/core/memalloc.c @@ -239,16 +239,12 @@ int snd_dma_alloc_pages_fallback(int typ int err; while ((err = snd_dma_alloc_pages(type, device, size, dmab)) < 0) { - size_t aligned_size; if (err != -ENOMEM) return err; if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) return -ENOMEM; - aligned_size = PAGE_SIZE << get_order(size); - if (size != aligned_size) - size = aligned_size; - else - size >>= 1; + size >>= 1; + size = PAGE_SIZE << get_order(size); } if (! dmab->area) return -ENOMEM;