Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2985675imu; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 14:19:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UpBu2bCTXN3naUF0h8Lw0tIqkg4AtY3S0erE7EOmrzl9yDUOJnywBGBK002OjSSh/towDw X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:31a4:: with SMTP id x33mr9712381plb.41.1544393980214; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:19:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544393980; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WMRdUVaSsBjY8hlJS5Fto1FRwX0J1djJ0cRb7+l93oypIKXqDChq184oK3Q6r099Nu bRobHtX2eTBH5Fl51oAoqBkmVtLYvP6smH2nfkOqdCKpwlDfaTAuehCXPzDtoimJYdzq NkT/aVNTWr9HHaOoSUqXzWX6oojbdZ8cUMBifr/MMheUEZjsF09Y2EG3/e+CKqRv950k t2v7LQ6MDmlnt5kl+XvaRmZFZOXzoA56NK9sZsVUGYtR0PJOt7zMFjy2qP6yPrshL/zL 8jc0lnqlspgl00f4uU/54S1o18p0fwXVyBsIlTioSF7tTOLDZQlXJTuD44rR9RpOMghN Qheg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=OOHXsirVlcDhZnEd+dgqCPebzdwPuFzX7qCRUF1wQKU=; b=w7DgOufZJeAgwJDWPzfCA6dgnII3uvvcgmGX38fw7jxbFQeVC0+8UawwiYK/lxh1CP kmso+zAxl4KGC67kol7wKLmoU4RFQ4vdpWyeFJccyGxMjCvXQUXs76+xUER4kz4YnhrP MGHhE8egZnPu5/62mWRjtvhevl+3oGINYdbQcS0g25OhH7q3vcIyve0ny9ypOs8OAPs2 NvGd696Z4Su329WneI1suBoZ6xEr7w2YHn0Vvw+QYMFMlvASkr0g5+vIpXX5XDzEicYO cyRqtUMnzHIxYqdvOnYn17lqWFntR+3jfD8FkSx4w4I8KzafYcMz4rLxmMH4hnBmil/b eR0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o16si8365426pgd.117.2018.12.09.14.19.25; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727504AbeLIWEU (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:04:20 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:35796 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726642AbeLIVzb (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 16:55:31 -0500 Received: from pub.yeoldevic.com ([81.174.156.145] helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72t-0002ii-QK; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:28 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72k-0003di-7O; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Jiri Olsa" , "CAI Qian" , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , "Rob Herring" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Alexander Shishkin" , "Kan Liang" , "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Jiri Olsa" Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 287/328] perf/core: Protect PMU device removal with a 'pmu_bus_running' check, to fix CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y kernel panic In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.174.156.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jiri Olsa commit 0933840acf7b65d6d30a5b6089d882afea57aca3 upstream. CAI Qian reported a crash in the PMU uncore device removal code, enabled by the CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y option: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147688837328451 The reason for the crash is that perf_pmu_unregister() tries to remove a PMU device which is not added at this point. We add PMU devices only after pmu_bus is registered, which happens in the perf_event_sysfs_init() call and sets the 'pmu_bus_running' flag. The fix is to get the 'pmu_bus_running' flag state at the point the PMU is taken out of the PMU list and remove the device later only if it's set. Reported-by: CAI Qian Tested-by: CAI Qian Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kan Liang Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161020111011.GA13361@krava Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [bwh: Backported to 3.16: no address filter attributes to clean up] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6930,7 +6930,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_register); void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu) { + int remove_device; + mutex_lock(&pmus_lock); + remove_device = pmu_bus_running; list_del_rcu(&pmu->entry); mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock); @@ -6944,8 +6947,10 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu free_percpu(pmu->pmu_disable_count); if (pmu->type >= PERF_TYPE_MAX) idr_remove(&pmu_idr, pmu->type); - device_del(pmu->dev); - put_device(pmu->dev); + if (remove_device) { + device_del(pmu->dev); + put_device(pmu->dev); + } free_pmu_context(pmu); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_unregister);