Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2988134imu; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 14:23:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VHd+p/enmJus2uMKabYklViXdgtwvKanBZKT0CFD2XgosmnH0kO4r1+5Rwg4c5cUX88PLe X-Received: by 2002:a65:4b82:: with SMTP id t2mr8897375pgq.189.1544394225960; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:23:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544394225; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ow7qg2+EMNCDmqZPa2xfzthv3FbwSEt5rN31W2flk0+2DgV/2xS/sms/yTVJAKzM6o 4kDRkHRDSMcQUBRuHUWpsKcsKTCmBWJIo3X0gASjXln57glZ/3euaHopJ5IYyHhrVofG yZbS4L+Nf3oeeNd6rzMeyTusz3Mvkyqr/tLjNSTB8q0NZrTHCTWSePiztDEcL1o0LX4w aAep3UOPiUKqRU+WnRZZvd2c7g68m/JB1g3g2qHVfRi/Nay24O51SzttnRY5DQuD7TFJ O2HaKH4fLxK2smpO2cxZSuIpr3W3rYgsNtwfs069YbR400QO2wH+csdKJqjIW7VyroGZ 9MVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=IMITQUy5eaLGeb0J+8O++vZg62Yxu3+/J8A0/BWSR0k=; b=0r0IlH4c09NIsFxJ0u4d3DWA0HUCpqGZh4/8EApxJiLf4/qdXTcaIYw7RtX5AffhgP s92Bc74P+PkDh/mSuT/WSLtb5wJJSBg8B+yjpj90ZGH9gKQs0gcH/6hqXUGTOl+uuOF8 l76/gOy7Owryuhp5agjN5FnepETUtE4FXSAphcNpWWfmG0qOjN4LLHWdRxMU0RTQ71GI hn7lh8yyQsyaG2CDwpCItcfA1hqUY50PgZjqa1vf0yrAsFRmpSk5LOmPDCWalDBNHo2e r372UjfaetGDvM/Gn7csaRqtscdw9LCz8WljkMNrEqkUXYbsvF0FjgEBZnj/Bgc6ItZj Zc4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r196si8128195pgr.311.2018.12.09.14.23.31; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:23:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727144AbeLIWWH (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:22:07 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:35164 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726507AbeLIVzV (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 16:55:21 -0500 Received: from pub.yeoldevic.com ([81.174.156.145] helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72k-0002ij-7U; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:18 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72h-0003Yi-HS; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Rodrigo Vivi" , "Imre Deak" , "Ville =?UTF-8?Q?Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?=" , "Diego Viola" Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 229/328] drm/i915/bdw: Increase IPS disable timeout to 100ms In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.174.156.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Imre Deak commit 92a6803149465e2339f8f7f8f6415d75be80073d upstream. During IPS disabling the current 42ms timeout value leads to occasional timeouts, increase it to 100ms which seems to get rid of the problem. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107494 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107562 Reported-by: Diego Viola Tested-by: Diego Viola Cc: Diego Viola Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180905100005.7663-1-imre.deak@intel.com (cherry picked from commit acb3ef0ee40ea657280a4a11d9f60eb2937c0dca) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi [bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -3794,8 +3794,12 @@ void hsw_disable_ips(struct intel_crtc * mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); WARN_ON(sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, DISPLAY_IPS_CONTROL, 0)); mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); - /* wait for pcode to finish disabling IPS, which may take up to 42ms */ - if (wait_for((I915_READ(IPS_CTL) & IPS_ENABLE) == 0, 42)) + /* + * Wait for PCODE to finish disabling IPS. The BSpec specified + * 42ms timeout value leads to occasional timeouts so use 100ms + * instead. + */ + if (wait_for((I915_READ(IPS_CTL) & IPS_ENABLE) == 0, 100)) DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for IPS disable\n"); } else { I915_WRITE(IPS_CTL, 0);