Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2993409imu; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 14:32:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XEv78rG7lzFAZlyR2oQfZzTk6MWlv9D+WPVZWqgu+PpkZSRHxF4b5bc81oOKbMKzw3wutq X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8687:: with SMTP id g7mr9870078plo.96.1544394756984; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:32:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544394756; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UCLpV/WI06mtNtIos4zuJZMDdByWeqeLralnkxznMcjmo+kgPwgGRJl3n5SkPYx+OR h3LWf0XG+GbFF1muaGrzVwJiS25XaIUTPF8gJXbMQWJX2REsCG9Jt+6Qv0Hwrixm6UBz DOrcBu95Wen4gEEyn8HULwMNaJGpeYwVoHQihzyIsh72QBpX4kJmUWfrYwuhVTQqRbNH NboPjOEH9t1UAwCVAncuZ8v9d/U/UxtF4oFMToRfhxUfYZSZ2UiFDJLD3Oyj0eejJ+pr gp6JXnLa8zpoizkk6nftPeCPFGXAAikKEYgV4W9DV/gVlaOBo63WYd/0SK0Bd34hOPmF f5bQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=I9Vg9ZQf/3K7Wlp1uFCcFd3lUxLc1OOkfoLpGiWsTRI=; b=WHgFt4ohLIRk4IwCnJw24V+7YR/ZS11xoXUsqqSIYWzGzxWqIt8TMEE6CcI2ZZyGtm vALwVjLxjTuQIz0KtLjKrYmW7Pxa6HFMW9heszLPzMKB0SOPPynss5MSKojlxzzPO9PK ttSIwaroUOIwFOWEoZdMSAzFGBCfBXLX2ZFRRAYFGvBhaKppRqk8hJMOExgK5t+zS/Wa aPImCeY/RvwOw/T0aV1TxuB9X+rFEbEhY6xGYKw3iRDmETVnht6PJ4r/TGslU++HLBi8 c3u0x9f9yD8IrkwVb+J1NcOMXSSdxZRb0/l8RxhqrsQTJ8nG2tZwsIyEMTJSsc1RBYG3 G50Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e17si8020788pgj.142.2018.12.09.14.32.21; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 14:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728773AbeLIW3d (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:29:33 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:34536 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726310AbeLIVzJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 16:55:09 -0500 Received: from pub.yeoldevic.com ([81.174.156.145] helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72Z-0002id-1U; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:07 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72X-0003CZ-Tc; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Martin Schwidefsky" , "Julian Wiedmann" Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 006/328] s390/qdio: reset old sbal_state flags In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.174.156.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Julian Wiedmann commit 64e03ff72623b8c2ea89ca3cb660094e019ed4ae upstream. When allocating a new AOB fails, handle_outbound() is still capable of transmitting the selected buffer (just without async completion). But if a previous transfer on this queue slot used async completion, its sbal_state flags field is still set to QDIO_OUTBUF_STATE_FLAG_PENDING. So when the upper layer driver sees this stale flag, it expects an async completion that never happens. Fix this by unconditionally clearing the flags field. Fixes: 104ea556ee7f ("qdio: support asynchronous delivery of storage blocks") Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- arch/s390/include/asm/qdio.h | 1 - drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/qdio.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/qdio.h @@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ struct qdio_outbuf_state { void *user; }; -#define QDIO_OUTBUF_STATE_FLAG_NONE 0x00 #define QDIO_OUTBUF_STATE_FLAG_PENDING 0x01 #define CHSC_AC1_INITIATE_INPUTQ 0x80 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c @@ -640,21 +640,20 @@ static inline unsigned long qdio_aob_for unsigned long phys_aob = 0; if (!q->use_cq) - goto out; + return 0; if (!q->aobs[bufnr]) { struct qaob *aob = qdio_allocate_aob(); q->aobs[bufnr] = aob; } if (q->aobs[bufnr]) { - q->sbal_state[bufnr].flags = QDIO_OUTBUF_STATE_FLAG_NONE; q->sbal_state[bufnr].aob = q->aobs[bufnr]; q->aobs[bufnr]->user1 = (u64) q->sbal_state[bufnr].user; phys_aob = virt_to_phys(q->aobs[bufnr]); WARN_ON_ONCE(phys_aob & 0xFF); } -out: + q->sbal_state[bufnr].flags = 0; return phys_aob; }