Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3296350imu; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:49:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VZF7Sr3LgRzZJrydRIq1iZDpmIVBsqBWId0F9oQMtSMgS9UVwYBMO3yOjPDfZ2N+tOUnDu X-Received: by 2002:a62:5fc4:: with SMTP id t187mr11395957pfb.66.1544424590128; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 22:49:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544424590; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aEUUSTKxEQIXUAgx2hBiTKJf3RUlnjvBEjo3V0qEP/qNLpUeUgME6jXUFxlyuVGtD9 JAS216o8MKrUlvCBmsttduXpdVFwK/ORz7ZE6r2YtrmFbeWLrtp06GjnqbEybhTcYvkT TnSCWP9XaVfjNN+9aZfwRw9ckdQHNgRHVpVLiZ/3EoZzCd1OODpdCFIeXkgVDPc1aNLv Y6jBDhxltGnwagr1Bf/Tgx4PyfM5jrLM84cH/b7JY/yV3KO6W0+eKjJSDM9iV1TG7FVm qMIy7k9tUfRr2VvCjUhCdVdVf5hBJn1S4p+NYnQwp9QPJV9WL/pi4igk84ZV8MMRIIVA HOqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=6y/SFnW0Gkjb6gmCmq+tFcSZ7ixJwnZhjD8q2hItKcw=; b=ZLSrGemsxtCjE4/jqKhw2gJcMR7qgVQoAieIw62CIi1Af/9YDqRAygbNvsQTtYSOTi DuuaW5orPMZ9RrszBza3tJCrYTJK/sDDVwLc/dGOdJT5DXLcJcXA8EeFPjryi5Q13wEC ClIUo8yLEwCCn8CMv+5dVPkNb7sgQ9uHOeLlyl+RDlTNi2Ak7/2P8RgoUyuLqE19pKtV wXp7VNQnRHfN9Rq/jCkZh35FaF+oXyvH/AJe+X0D86+cYTybznjsaeEREjbqFLV+g+nA D/bkW6mnkGZ0Jv0mqx5AuV9h+9AgD3OEvbisot+11mRhXJZnXlIpMk4kK0PnKMDc6kq9 FhvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si9676698plk.260.2018.12.09.22.49.32; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 22:49:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726471AbeLJGcH (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 01:32:07 -0500 Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:59976 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726100AbeLJGcH (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 01:32:07 -0500 Received: from emea4-mta.ukb.novell.com ([10.120.13.87]) by smtp.nue.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 07:32:04 +0100 Received: from linux-l9pv.suse (nwb-a10-snat.microfocus.com [10.120.13.202]) by emea4-mta.ukb.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 06:31:58 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:31:53 +0800 From: joeyli To: Chen Yu Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lenny Szubowicz , Jacob Pan , Rui Zhang , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC v2] ACPI: acpi_pad: Do not launch acpi_pad threads on idle cpus Message-ID: <20181210063153.GO5327@linux-l9pv.suse> References: <1525521202-32519-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1525521202-32519-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chen Yu and ACPI experts, On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 07:53:22PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote: > According to current implementation of acpi_pad driver, > it does not make sense to spawn any power saving threads > on the cpus which are already idle - it might bring > unnecessary overhead on these idle cpus and causes power > waste. So verify the condition that if the number of 'busy' > cpus exceeds the amount of the 'forced idle' cpus is met. > This is applicable due to round-robin attribute of the > power saving threads, otherwise ignore the setting/ACPI > notification. > > Suggested-by: Lenny Szubowicz > Suggested-by: Len Brown > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Cc: Lenny Szubowicz > Cc: Len Brown > Cc: Jacob Pan > Cc: Rui Zhang > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu Do you have any news for this patch? Why it did not merged by kernel maineline? Thanks a lot! Joey Lee > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c > index 552c1f7..515e60e 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c > @@ -254,12 +254,62 @@ static void set_power_saving_task_num(unsigned int num) > } > } > > +/* > + * Extra acpi_pad threads should not be created until > + * the requested idle count is less than/equals to the > + * number of the busy cpus - it does not make sense to > + * throttle the idle cpus. > + */ > +#define SAMPLE_INTERVAL_JIF 20 > + > +static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu) > +{ > + u64 idle, idle_usecs = -1ULL; > + > + idle_usecs = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL); > + > + if (idle_usecs == -1ULL) > + idle = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE]; > + else > + idle = idle_usecs * NSEC_PER_USEC; > + > + return idle; > +} > + > +static bool idle_nr_valid(unsigned int num_cpus) > +{ > + int busy_nr = 0, i = 0, load_thresh = 100 - idle_pct; > + > + if (!num_cpus) > + return true; > + > + for_each_online_cpu(i) { > + u64 wall_time, idle_time; > + unsigned int elapsed_delta, idle_delta, load; > + > + wall_time = jiffies64_to_nsecs(get_jiffies_64()); > + idle_time = get_idle_time(i); > + /* Wait and see... */ > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(SAMPLE_INTERVAL_JIF); > + > + idle_delta = get_idle_time(i) - idle_time; > + elapsed_delta = jiffies64_to_nsecs(get_jiffies_64()) - wall_time; > + idle_delta = (idle_delta > elapsed_delta) ? elapsed_delta : idle_delta; > + load = 100 * (elapsed_delta - idle_delta) / elapsed_delta; > + if (load >= load_thresh) > + busy_nr++; > + } > + > + return (busy_nr >= num_cpus) ? true : false; > +} > + > static void acpi_pad_idle_cpus(unsigned int num_cpus) > { > get_online_cpus(); > > num_cpus = min_t(unsigned int, num_cpus, num_online_cpus()); > - set_power_saving_task_num(num_cpus); > + if (idle_nr_valid(num_cpus)) > + set_power_saving_task_num(num_cpus); > > put_online_cpus(); > } > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html