Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265298AbUATCyC (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:54:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265362AbUATCuV (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:50:21 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:21963 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265298AbUATCqZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:46:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:46:30 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jim Keniston Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, jkenisto@us.ibm.com, scott.feldman@intel.com, kessler@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.1] Net device error logging Message-Id: <20040119184630.5d066735.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <400C3D3E.BFCC25CE@us.ibm.com> References: <400C3D3E.BFCC25CE@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 20 Jim Keniston wrote: > > The enclosed patch implements the netdev_* error-logging macros for > network drivers. Looks OK to me. But it does make one wonder whether we'll soon see standalone patches for scsi_printk(), pci_bridge_printk(), random_other_subsystem_printk(), ...? Or is it intended that the backend logging code will be implemented mainly in terms of the `struct device'? So netdev_printk() will be a bit of netdev-specific boilerplate which then calls into a more generic device_printk()? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/