Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3853470imu; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:50:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UyZkzKhct3TkammFI0WdbPKGIRDfyzzTg4HR7iFGvTLIDon9gyqrfIaINrc2kMHg3oIN3A X-Received: by 2002:a63:bf0b:: with SMTP id v11mr11757938pgf.302.1544460648954; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:50:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544460648; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EClcyFdoE3Mg3T3rXmbw+xBBYeH1qFWeOqkNa2xur0Qsqf3Z6bcX6x6ITNb62k6S2n ZR53FEzfM/080dycd0SRt3IJ5dmUbiKva1qipb/QSz/rmRiMn/2e6JjrGxQ6a7YjxvXd YpenRHaEROR5b4kMYNPoZSavR9eyS6NUDRqNlEdsuhvk62M1j4pp9AXF7MOhvvh1RzV8 jhRoEMFOO5Y2hEVq9m4bU5NipH5Vd6iDW2UwXjB2BbVXtpBQ14akKI2qVyqSMPQNHMrh zYCvA7aCrnV27GtgZpiO0XuvZGycA0qIDfl7jPenwydRWNEqjS01bFDfnBZgAahpulz5 rVZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=VcRx/sk/JIDgc6qs0A8WB3wEc565b8bdR5XcVGijwTg=; b=gthX6CsywhiZHf20Nd8F2C7HcBGTwEp1lr1aIJ1JNwn84ifr0Adu/jjMd8P7j5IrUY COfvuN9ei3rdx9MOC5mI1s9Uhzdt0zpSBXG8lK4VdQuDzzZKgNYjoaSR/8CyUi+1c+IN /UpI7SiXby3TpUp9XFU0xiXh2Vbr+An5ZEmJQzE1oMlLqYxLdZB6/85vrVkGOGnB1O1h MZsy9Cijn8YRrMJzlE1OSnqCvQ58PgF+MYZhjq/LOyjEJ+hYfqJHAHm5A4YM9pYxGiVB lHRDC6jPOx9ohEiCVcqOpaUKzaFlo7K+4/ubszy6B6YItQR2IIXFax+ZqhC+qncWMFKp 20zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="gCZsw/8I"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o19si10998679pfi.261.2018.12.10.08.50.33; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:50:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="gCZsw/8I"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727866AbeLJPKI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:10:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:36345 "EHLO mail-ed1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727109AbeLJPKI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:10:08 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id f23so9776002edb.3 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 07:10:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VcRx/sk/JIDgc6qs0A8WB3wEc565b8bdR5XcVGijwTg=; b=gCZsw/8InAGPInFqf0PJGVegDnO11zBooZ09tNLmRx0DVNKk84G3Bp6DHFpqhW4jvY A3Yk0Q1T5N2LuvXLqaF/6qJU5VFKxeA6FUBxJDRna9wlLcmfw/bnTLBEaku3pfrEdkVy HAV9nuHigmKC9i6mq9d/yZnKN0f5AEs0jeQ/rFbyAIqkT1hNFezaX2uf9oCfkmnNrhSU rxcT2V78lRUHyPPwiDqPi12GmNIFAALUYz73i5ucwewlGgWc0M4plLm/NzyerENJuIX1 jNXCyVICpI8nrvVVVwlNwF3G/k9iXOvFMjnSaGi3kujJzSI619XcaHVB2k9gAzHP0uEo 9ilA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VcRx/sk/JIDgc6qs0A8WB3wEc565b8bdR5XcVGijwTg=; b=s9yDAAmPLOgbhWgwjTDiTffkPeF7UtOjeH2rTJk4z7Et1pYT8XloU3XJ/pSFfsYw02 q6QLdfChQehguaKU1jHXVYNaY5xROGt58b4Fzo2jyKp6l/rT7lAn7ef2A2AQ7FuIL3s1 yWX8KFNhbRnEUp722hxJlmvDrefjxg1+9bANKX9jDFHr0Y4jv/TCrOBRoewISiVoXP9M gbIUw6NkuJnK6+FCobO09v4bOsjFTZu4sj5//y3X95T2vTihmfcgkulumfNGnojT9xW1 jiGMc+dIvIDk9poxbHl8cLAOtSTlk+VlgGr7O/FqBMUG7ffzzVZS3n33aIFGmCo8HHhQ ZgHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaSU6AHQfN5jpWQKgVRZsR1wnYRRItMBMb0ybzZZPl5Kp8+Puts oEEhQYqvL25v6LBmfa76Llk= X-Received: by 2002:a50:fa0c:: with SMTP id b12mr11349611edq.138.1544454606543; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 07:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s12sm3434265edb.43.2018.12.10.07.10.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 07:10:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:10:05 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: Mikhail Zaslonko Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section Message-ID: <20181210151005.xukiibwbb6ohqyex@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20181210130712.30148-1-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> <20181210130712.30148-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181210130712.30148-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote: >If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the >mapping of such a section is only partly initialized. This may lead to >VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct page access from >is_mem_section_removable() or test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by >memory_hotplug sysfs handlers: > > page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) > Call Trace: > ([<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160) > [<00000000008f15c4>] show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190 > [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70 > [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148 > [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480 > [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178 > [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138 > [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0 > [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8 > Last Breaking-Event-Address: > [<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160 > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops > >Fix the problem by initializing the last memory section of the highest zone >in memmap_init_zone() till the very end, even if it goes beyond the zone >end. > >Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko >Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer >Cc: >--- > mm/page_alloc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >index 2ec9cc407216..41ef5508e5f1 100644 >--- a/mm/page_alloc.c >+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >@@ -5542,6 +5542,21 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, > cond_resched(); > } > } >+#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM >+ /* >+ * If there is no zone spanning the rest of the section >+ * then we should at least initialize those pages. Otherwise we >+ * could blow up on a poisoned page in some paths which depend >+ * on full sections being initialized (e.g. memory hotplug). >+ */ >+ if (end_pfn == max_pfn) { >+ while (end_pfn % PAGES_PER_SECTION) { >+ __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(end_pfn), end_pfn, zone, >+ nid); >+ end_pfn++; >+ } >+ } >+#endif If my understanding is correct, end_pfn is not a valid range. memmap_init_zone() initialize the range [start_pfn, start_pfn + size). I am afraid this will break the syntax. And max_pfn is also not a valid one. For example, on x86, update_end_of_memory_vars() will update max_pfn, which is calculated by: end_pfn = PFN_UP(start + size); BTW, as you mentioned this apply to hotplug case. And then why this couldn't happen during boot up? What differ these two cases? > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE >-- >2.16.4 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me