Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3891077imu; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:23:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Xyk0cjyk4TcXhN1HhGk23kgm0tkDlSiDeaDPbfUpp1JJhAKNJf0yiEr/ksz+msPhxRGK+W X-Received: by 2002:a63:c10f:: with SMTP id w15mr11476565pgf.199.1544462628344; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:23:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544462628; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=clOpet+luSpTP1aoI72scZCb5kJSjaUqd7eIjZUq58rVScRCNYpS3vslB/GUIyone3 eV1FMioezijCQAo4gOCxhnAwdAOIovJ4QFf3KVGGsPHtL1sRUP9hNfNy1G6flE35aTFn R7fKQpEbd47d/yM4SiJ/ZqFeSWdv6+WP2X/hXC/Rz8ksm+3Y5693t/W9vYj1XoEhhInn B7mAVAki7pMhdNYJSTWjMYJu2uEj5lYiCn/MNFzglXMjRXL/VmSC0Vjtui4tbp+KeV1C OkmizS0ixEBrf5LxcrzmgrWrqkTEtqdaTuIJbE8f7UwYNbqZ3/1+M/zgybu0WyV5GnHa /jjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=HogUER/Mz3h67G7TcX9cz7CaAu+8Eg6H1gw9jl8+5sQ=; b=cqVjpNYTipDviJCPLjWXmJYFejMkR/GSMXKIFI2hazpV3+aA7rYO0N2dNoAQCxE5N+ WgEPpzFYv39dUw+01gycSYZmlqNmgIK9Fxl+ZB1D3wiq6ruyT+B/eKk1qqqebBR4F0Yw HYbFfQD/Wr4mQUfi6Mua4Q4vzcQGOEvNRRhksRxKYXlvykUhaEwel6VULE9ufVbuR5uP D5czv/Bn/WLdfg6xytCHYck3r1pHnWFsj2hmqex1haQe7k7ejv+5gjaO4ul5c8sNMDEc 6q24ipA2n5XwepJVmbTO0IzVq/KeAvfGjOEQiE3AwV5SWPcP0bHcJ/5ZJvs5McxhAjUT LxYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y2si10751302pfy.29.2018.12.10.09.23.33; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728304AbeLJRNd (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:13:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54125 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727356AbeLJRNd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:13:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A2823154848; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from horse.redhat.com (unknown [10.18.25.234]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AC9600D6; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by horse.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 10451) id 0F31A223BB9; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:13:30 -0500 (EST) From: Vivek Goyal To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, miklos@szeredi.hu, stefanha@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, sweil@redhat.com, swhiteho@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH 03/52] fuse: rely on mutex_unlock() barrier instead of fput() Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:12:29 -0500 Message-Id: <20181210171318.16998-4-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181210171318.16998-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> References: <20181210171318.16998-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stefan Hajnoczi fput() will be moved out of this function in a later patch, so we cannot rely on it as the memory barrier for ensuring file->private_data = fud is visible. Luckily there is a mutex_unlock() right before fput() which provides the same effect. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index 0b94b23b02d4..d08cd8bf7705 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -1198,12 +1198,11 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) list_add_tail(&fc->entry, &fuse_conn_list); sb->s_root = root_dentry; file->private_data = fud; - mutex_unlock(&fuse_mutex); /* - * atomic_dec_and_test() in fput() provides the necessary - * memory barrier for file->private_data to be visible on all - * CPUs after this + * mutex_unlock() provides the necessary memory barrier for + * file->private_data to be visible on all CPUs after this */ + mutex_unlock(&fuse_mutex); fput(file); fuse_send_init(fc, init_req); -- 2.13.6