Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp112472imu; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:19:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Wjcu8C+ZLa84DCZGT7tX6afFy70Ue6dnsxlq4c7NNDNz/Ufgcftjq5swGXa9AliDJzQ7K0 X-Received: by 2002:a63:65c7:: with SMTP id z190mr12925050pgb.249.1544491185083; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:19:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544491185; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KmYU4Dfa9W/tt+lfsL4WsBA92MWYYbjEym3ChIGEOtEZg7yeAOwpmYrELe1mBKyBEg 5iVBGO6+OkNC5MmA3wFruKIiQSS4bIeThdCzq2gjThYuSfpBRcjD/KBbdyI32eWuz5HK YqixtU4l+j2rT68qKRDn9memcpMRN+ZNUU+cwQKxCrImjE55+hPpiNNggHlFqY6c9fPo I7kRd7qcd38OJ7C71AGBqkR2SYvMCYvBvm0JoWCXCUL0A7/y0GHPg4s+kYjqzhokrzvi We7JVB5QOJcxjzUlANnUikKhlgyAg/QgYRhK/q5mTpNIhSsASGdJKAn8aZ81VTbADqfz +4Ow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=GGrNNXX+WIr2kKXZ6UK4s/DibINsvZn+aSI/c4myHB8=; b=06X+Tb5K6UEBd9c5pgwsKN3CRwur+6ixCaGVcy4TLEhtZ3+RP2j2+X8H2sC4YUUP3z dtGROXiCH81wM4Vhz7UMY1HXoTLiO5/jlY5xQwkwGc/X1ZLYMNnUqzc69Bs9JcS1b6+c ctwPys6tfjAhPq3dPARACnyQ4hdbhI5jVDt41DreTg7KSg6QVF9HkDiwkTfyX+U/ft6j vh7AnMzbsYRGnitPn9ZvLUf8rfl1pLVQ8mu1JxqgkNghRk+BZTNbAaRovbe+8nQCc9ix wJ9WwSOPj3nn6NtTRnRw/NrUznEIbOnUPBiGQWdlPSkUVZ6tM26ksXFw93lOyLTwMpvo 528g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="p/xZ21JM"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11si10999429plt.26.2018.12.10.17.19.29; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="p/xZ21JM"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729365AbeLJWYz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:24:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52714 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726024AbeLJWYz (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:24:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [69.71.4.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA46F2082F; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:24:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544480694; bh=8GzBDr3IF05sb1PvOTqA+jHGxjPF7TVcwt9aEuUlBwQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=p/xZ21JMR9j4tF0BjajlBcch/e7wrIEV1MJ82mLUSo3FgL/hY54+NV8P6smqjCt2w m/df6HtJyUuuiMXy5oR+9GQarUEl+Ys/3hH6fSelszpZ6Byi+03M+C4ojiyNpOKZtI yEf4Rgz0mMLoefLdLcPRRCRcpVQlJdHiAPJdiONY= Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:24:52 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" Cc: "bjorn@helgaas.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "Mertarg10@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 201647] New: Intel Wireless card 3165 does not get detected but bluetooth works Message-ID: <20181210222452.GC85090@google.com> References: <20181128211959.GB178809@google.com> <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB3013373E4A3@HASMSX112.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB3013373E4A3@HASMSX112.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 06:57:35AM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 03:43:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > From: > > > Date: Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:10 AM > > > Subject: [Bug 201647] New: Intel Wireless card 3165 does not get > > > detected but bluetooth works > > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201647 > > > > > > Bug ID: 201647 > > > Summary: Intel Wireless card 3165 does not get detected but > > > bluetooth works > > > Product: Drivers > > > Version: 2.5 > > > Kernel Version: 4.19.1 > > > Hardware: Intel > > > OS: Linux > > > Tree: Mainline > > > Status: NEW > > > Severity: high > > > Priority: P1 > > > Component: PCI > > > Assignee: drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > > > Reporter: Mertarg10@gmail.com > > > Regression: No > > > > > > This bug affects most of the devices with a Celeron N4000 and an Intel > > > wifi 3165 Ac adapter. > > > > > > When using Linux wifi is not working however, Bluetooth is working > > > fine. Also, Bluetooth part of this chip is connected via btusb and > > > the wifi part of this chip is connected via PCIe. > > > > Can you attach a screenshot of the Windows 10 device manager info for the > > wifi adapter to the bugzilla? If you can get a raw hex dump of its config > > space, that would be awesome. > > > > Also attach a copy of your kernel .config file (typically in /boot/). > > > > My only guess is that maybe the system keeps wifi completely powered > > down and uses hotplug to add it when needed. [1] mentions wifi being on > > pcibus 1 under Windows. Your lspci does show bridge 00:13.0 leading to bus > > 01, but Linux doesn't find any devices on bus 01. > > > > Hotplug could be done via either acpiphp (ACPI mediated hotplug) or pciehp > > (native PCIe hotplug). Your dmesg shows you do have acpiphp. > > > > I can't tell about pciehp (your .config will show that), but I think pciehp will > > only claim bridges where SltCap contains HotPlug+, and yours shows HotPlug- > > , so I don't think pciehp will do anything on your system. > > > > Even if the system does use hotplug, I don't know what mechanism the OS > > would use to wake up the device, since we don't know it even exists. I guess > > there could be some magic switch accessible via USB. > > But if that were the case, I'm sure Emmanuel would know about it. > > Hm... Don't be so sure... :) > I don't think we have anything as fancy as this. > I guess you can try to dig into the BIOS settings? > I have heard of such a switch that would make the device disappear. It's worth looking, but I don't understand how a BIOS switch would solve this problem. I assume that with the same BIOS settings, Windows works and Linux fails. Maybe there would be a clue in an acpidump from affected machines, e.g., maybe we'd see some kind of ACPI hotplug notification. That seems like a long shot because we do have acpiphp in the kernel, and it *should* be handling such notifications, but it could always be broken. The Windows device manager info (requested above) would be interesting. Bjorn