Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp314815imu; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:40:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WaUkkDBtYElwdmp01C2vU0sbFEVADOmF5VSIA8SRnl4PULVBCg/ZF5DN0e7ZG/09kDDMVl X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e18c:: with SMTP id cd12mr14070313plb.279.1544510403757; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:40:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544510403; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TNyoqTvvEykMdfZWez1C+NyBIpaQtqFXaD5WjhBu3bMvG62WcHLXG89wsgaDJA6lLo gkRb4j9eQazQhCE2Mja6rfm+ZkUoXu6JB+fobtop+o5wHOxaiofZHSfqauVb989lKOaT SJWbV6Ys9UDDCkq9+OCCHdp18O3plKEtlzr6lxvEtxajEC1xNFKfjGcHAdL+8/zDjF5X Brr4KKaTh7xMXB08fIVwktbZNoMcLfNgiP4xLRNFIzGvPpELUi13JwDMEQSkTZPYDfyp asNBrzD/eESDcm8UT1jTegW8GfGWwAip+nhsE4TkC2HCWXISqoYvKOKQxKUcbbHc6O/J XPWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :dlp-reaction:dlp-version:dlp-product:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=FF4WrVPf0dq93jHuWLerSnLyoHoa4ghSxUFVr2ZtDF8=; b=pgSGcqmZTZDgRpA48GNr/xrmHNJlCUTAGEr05v3/4YHjbXefJcarnKO2Uk3W1ZEix2 YuL4BLsoEwBVK3IkGGL1I6dGFEdeZNsBH3E7O+yKB5Wv25yA97o+uLtaruwhUIrZmfpI ZP2S6VnKyJcLc03eLfiv1dYAVCWx/cTDFBBrXbv8ljOlVw75vinjlVPWmmrIXxMX0r68 TXKJsl1YcuOcakNgxVopddUfHCA6DtwbhGEDptUCrvzL4YALzznphs0APaHX0LQAuJXC j9K1O2CqYpuDIk0p5+SiOM0W3GJZmDOTLNJQJr0MmrBXfPUzM51pDJLh1MvGSdDohmrs ZUlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h3si11809225pgi.391.2018.12.10.22.39.47; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727146AbeLKGfZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 01:35:25 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:33857 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725923AbeLKGfY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 01:35:24 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2018 22:35:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,341,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="106492659" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2018 22:35:24 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:35:24 -0800 Received: from lcsmsx152.ger.corp.intel.com (10.186.165.231) by fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:35:23 -0800 Received: from hasmsx112.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.88]) by LCSMSX152.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.186.165.231]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:35:21 +0200 From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: "bjorn@helgaas.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "Mertarg10@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: Fwd: [Bug 201647] New: Intel Wireless card 3165 does not get detected but bluetooth works Thread-Topic: Fwd: [Bug 201647] New: Intel Wireless card 3165 does not get detected but bluetooth works Thread-Index: AQHUh2ApCc7lmNGfg0mZ5cTxRsuvBaVrCVdwgA10uACAAKnQcA== Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:35:20 +0000 Message-ID: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB30133754C00@HASMSX112.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20181128211959.GB178809@google.com> <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB3013373E4A3@HASMSX112.ger.corp.intel.com> <20181210222452.GC85090@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20181210222452.GC85090@google.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYTEzYmU4YmEtYmU4Mi00ZmY5LTk5ZGYtNzBiYjA5ODlhM2Q5IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiSEhrRDZDTE0wRG55dmRab3F3MEU4bTBhWVVKcHUzYlZNNkZ6UXVVbnNxd0VUajRYeG55d1NlelJJZjVsOW5RQyJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.251.82.25] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201647 > > > > > > > > Bug ID: 201647 > > > > Summary: Intel Wireless card 3165 does not get detected but > > > > bluetooth works > > > > Product: Drivers > > > > Version: 2.5 > > > > Kernel Version: 4.19.1 > > > > Hardware: Intel > > > > OS: Linux > > > > Tree: Mainline > > > > Status: NEW > > > > Severity: high > > > > Priority: P1 > > > > Component: PCI > > > > Assignee: drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > > > > Reporter: Mertarg10@gmail.com > > > > Regression: No > > > > > > > > This bug affects most of the devices with a Celeron N4000 and an > > > > Intel wifi 3165 Ac adapter. > > > > > > > > When using Linux wifi is not working however, Bluetooth is working > > > > fine. Also, Bluetooth part of this chip is connected via btusb > > > > and the wifi part of this chip is connected via PCIe. > > > > > > Can you attach a screenshot of the Windows 10 device manager info > > > for the wifi adapter to the bugzilla? If you can get a raw hex dump > > > of its config space, that would be awesome. > > > > > > Also attach a copy of your kernel .config file (typically in /boot/). > > > > > > My only guess is that maybe the system keeps wifi completely powered > > > down and uses hotplug to add it when needed. [1] mentions wifi > > > being on pcibus 1 under Windows. Your lspci does show bridge > > > 00:13.0 leading to bus 01, but Linux doesn't find any devices on bus 01. > > > > > > Hotplug could be done via either acpiphp (ACPI mediated hotplug) or > > > pciehp (native PCIe hotplug). Your dmesg shows you do have acpiphp. > > > > > > I can't tell about pciehp (your .config will show that), but I think > > > pciehp will only claim bridges where SltCap contains HotPlug+, and > > > yours shows HotPlug- , so I don't think pciehp will do anything on your > system. > > > > > > Even if the system does use hotplug, I don't know what mechanism the > > > OS would use to wake up the device, since we don't know it even > > > exists. I guess there could be some magic switch accessible via USB. > > > But if that were the case, I'm sure Emmanuel would know about it. > > > > Hm... Don't be so sure... :) > > I don't think we have anything as fancy as this. > > I guess you can try to dig into the BIOS settings? > > I have heard of such a switch that would make the device disappear. > > It's worth looking, but I don't understand how a BIOS switch would solve this > problem. I assume that with the same BIOS settings, Windows works and > Linux fails. I guess I had a typo there... I have *not* heard of such a switch. > > Maybe there would be a clue in an acpidump from affected machines, e.g., > maybe we'd see some kind of ACPI hotplug notification. That seems like a > long shot because we do have acpiphp in the kernel, and it *should* be > handling such notifications, but it could always be broken. > > The Windows device manager info (requested above) would be interesting. > Indeed. FWIW: I saw another problem like this with a 9650 device. PS: PCI folks don't use bugzilla's anymore? It's all over the mailing list?