Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp359284imu; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:41:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XqsA0sEPTjBVwdqhZBuocWojRUFVMH64/FJVFpIXemC/NekJO5Ov3cMVTRgWZlbZrIo0lY X-Received: by 2002:a63:eb0e:: with SMTP id t14mr13844817pgh.445.1544514115377; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:41:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544514115; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Rqp1pELZtCur62onICV9qYCOLm70pJJOspvICxtGxp34Sz/SEktPxK4BTI0XguYvt2 MXvBthQrsAVOlieytIqED3RSiQTVbrNig3iHygY5QBzZ24Etk2DAA/EUVoSib9KDlxNd BrejOfLAS3qq4cXUIQJ/g/3/2UyHi+Ad7YqGTT0zRVRoJpYaD2OD5wyMsBfkjEbqm4be hFRUgTLKsVd8LkBO83oNrMMw8a2TQ9HdKVviytTDSRULS/qxdwojOJ9yCaRk6H3LpZ1d ufWfCwwym0b3ikHWcvV+Iu1ArWQkUIx5cPSY0F1et/NTeUaCaOurtVyjhqLCGLDYlEWu QpZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=mLWiAqN9O2/h7R2V1jDZK7ROs4Kq3pLvcay7+sOXvAk=; b=hg37HxKGKc7nqVBSeIXPuRPIlIwGSmVT2GUvNPb6uxTcgSyVPlaNzuNk93N5+7j4oI Kq0KrdVN4OjjUXiknXLJ2foK/wImCC4VA64WhIhENYKMRzQMhAg1L2PxCi/3o1e0gHuN 0HG72FpNWRKcUyLn5isfx2IbPOymBObtT/D6MfjjecrtLgo2qehhJxTZlXHkWirL+lM9 oL36acDz5AjEAD43hBjJPkK/7obwFra1SPa0JgHy88Pt81inTOjz+NVtW5SgzLm+sQE0 2JGreptAm6bCsTY/Sxyao5gjTUOf8gcAJ67IZ27YVZ2+QxwTgD8j3cYJgomjtFjAaz4g n48A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=IgzZwIgR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 82si13404584pfa.115.2018.12.10.23.41.34; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=IgzZwIgR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726234AbeLKHkg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 02:40:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:45990 "EHLO mail-wr1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725993AbeLKHkg (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 02:40:36 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b14so12949213wru.12 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:40:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=mLWiAqN9O2/h7R2V1jDZK7ROs4Kq3pLvcay7+sOXvAk=; b=IgzZwIgRJYXQqYm4CKMxjNs8DOwkpBTMmA2RqZsUDz0n5lKYvy1PIY7p2OxGnpbfzD 5c57q1h8fV0zuqoGByB+LWOJgV8lwQQZs/jYNIfNlBrOmLDEY9P5/HGzoxwJke1xB7qs BlEmYhpZwAlinsi76PLA+86t/oAWID8wS9Ckg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=mLWiAqN9O2/h7R2V1jDZK7ROs4Kq3pLvcay7+sOXvAk=; b=Bq873YSBJXJQ5MDfPxI3/VpzY1TMb2NrOaRhNty1rZQu4IsJC7Vt6TDS1KTDkjB16n iYfpa3nKtDypu66XnlYaRd/UKm2CssT6+yj+iJSc5TCGVONRkGbZsrZ4cIUojuebCFQY NkUYny/GhJmvD53Cbp651721pQ/XGL50SkRMiMf777ApJa1AprfGEf2xUZ3dx1mNKils 7SmrAPD+U8Q7ESdAS0zWElFintGdQaOSBivBwX0c2ln7iLm6KtaK5d2Cyj+QKnlUCNWN q3TZok0V77kjRaCMA3DGA0jNpKYwXihGh/qt9uLImyIp2psT3ryYtAQax+BPLVfqdjxr 4B6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYc/ttjY7ggcs7t82OLnqsmWUJiRb2XrNToTZti6EP0XmpKKYYA if/QdMxSmkB8B9h0B0B+x5kmAA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e149:: with SMTP id f9mr13540430wri.42.1544514033386; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([209.250.228.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k7sm14186961wrl.51.2018.12.10.23.40.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:40:32 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Yan To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mathieu Poirier , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Coresight ML Cc: Leo Yan , Mike Leach , Robert Walker Subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] perf cs-etm: Avoid stale branch samples when flush packet Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:38:22 +0800 Message-Id: <1544513908-16805-3-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1544513908-16805-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> References: <1544513908-16805-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At the end of trace buffer handling, function cs_etm__flush() is invoked to flush any remaining branch stack entries. As a side effect, it also generates branch sample, because the 'etmq->packet' doesn't contains any new coming packet but point to one stale packet after packets swapping, so it wrongly makes synthesize branch samples with stale packet info. We could review below detailed flow which causes issue: Packet1: start_addr=0xffff000008b1fbf0 end_addr=0xffff000008b1fbfc Packet2: start_addr=0xffff000008b1fb5c end_addr=0xffff000008b1fb6c step 1: cs_etm__sample(): sample: ip=(0xffff000008b1fbfc-4) addr=0xffff000008b1fb5c step 2: flush packet in cs_etm__run_decoder(): cs_etm__run_decoder() `-> err = cs_etm__flush(etmq, false); sample: ip=(0xffff000008b1fb6c-4) addr=0xffff000008b1fbf0 Packet1 and packet2 are two continuous packets, when packet2 is the new coming packet, cs_etm__sample() generates branch sample for these two packets and use [packet1::end_addr - 4 => packet2::start_addr] as branch jump flow, thus we can see the first generated branch sample in step 1. At the end of cs_etm__sample() it swaps packets so 'etm->prev_packet'= packet2 and 'etm->packet'=packet1, so far it's okay for branch sample. If packet2 is the last one packet in trace buffer, even there have no any new coming packet, cs_etm__run_decoder() invokes cs_etm__flush() to flush branch stack entries as expected, but it also generates branch samples by taking 'etm->packet' as a new coming packet, thus the branch jump flow is as [packet2::end_addr - 4 => packet1::start_addr]; this is the second sample which is generated in step 2. So actually the second sample is a stale sample and we should not generate it. This patch introduces a new function cs_etm__end_block(), at the end of trace block this function is invoked to only flush branch stack entries and thus can avoid to generate branch sample for stale packet. Signed-off-by: Leo Yan Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Mike Leach Cc: Robert Walker --- tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c index 789707b..ffc4fe5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c @@ -1055,6 +1055,39 @@ static int cs_etm__flush(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq) return err; } +static int cs_etm__end_block(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq) +{ + int err; + + /* + * It has no new packet coming and 'etmq->packet' contains the stale + * packet which was set at the previous time with packets swapping; + * so skip to generate branch sample to avoid stale packet. + * + * For this case only flush branch stack and generate a last branch + * event for the branches left in the circular buffer at the end of + * the trace. + */ + if (etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch && + etmq->prev_packet->sample_type == CS_ETM_RANGE) { + /* + * Use the address of the end of the last reported execution + * range. + */ + u64 addr = cs_etm__last_executed_instr(etmq->prev_packet); + + err = cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample( + etmq, addr, + etmq->period_instructions); + if (err) + return err; + + etmq->period_instructions = 0; + } + + return 0; +} + static int cs_etm__run_decoder(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq) { struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm = etmq->etm; @@ -1137,7 +1170,7 @@ static int cs_etm__run_decoder(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq) if (err == 0) /* Flush any remaining branch stack entries */ - err = cs_etm__flush(etmq); + err = cs_etm__end_block(etmq); } return err; -- 2.7.4