Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp385351imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:17:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Xht7rKvPoR8lAqQ6dOeZpubIbkO/Y8c4L+BmSgjOV4cF04UMwDPLzf203h1kGT9sIKFAbA X-Received: by 2002:a62:7dcb:: with SMTP id y194mr15561821pfc.113.1544516243677; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:17:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544516243; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0MtFzqco60dTRcXh9caL8U37GuxM2+ysMc58TimVv8RBn4zeOzi8BIOXScIasL0pQG UVydgd0t63Mds0zvt8Ff1obUdhGu6RxyeB0P4f9KR8EmxxfUeFVZa84jXusUHHDl0iZS GW3B8T7x6eW1t+DDWXTrue4JS08sbX2N7oheiVCDNPINpggt0Vo5xmYBzJSpgyBTc6fM Rhl4AkvfPIZk6Tp4IcTyVH0QDQRYy37YRwP6jJG+xmbXdBvAZQNTqcCGkrl7ki9YQTt7 kZdD8VT7bZ4ElQEPDaYx63Tacrp2w8R0iHrCn8XRgVIIBrlG2fuZhdpBrSAmA/HqbJeL 0kVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from; bh=CK63iVBiQKOhA+obmXaNu+TI/X+wDHmiDMdA0696YMA=; b=JflpEo4E+4YYOW26DtOm15LXGe1CEfjNq5Nv+eO6J7/uqpTB6KXBi/UcexpsSM7vWv KSNRDqOwoJyBGyPdZsWjKh0y9vvaW8Homi2Gk1M4KvSXqyfg8Gq8l/9jGEDEFyD40DsO LPgwHiDFVHyMdh7v5l6n3dUBBn6aaaQQVsOO5cbW58P289IlNesvAd72mUGw7QYDIMEO +gsLKNHp7vOJX7HeQqXMvZUIEn6+XM4M1aOsmn5X/1DP6r8iUhHrXvwFijSX03y2toex Yw/SOIPrNf6WZtoHQM1Nb7j8YdV6MWNNufs8XaISqMRNcO2agsLs5+Kqrcli+2yIMNRk hACg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si12072959plr.189.2018.12.11.00.17.04; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726179AbeLKIQN (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 03:16:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25990 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726050AbeLKIQN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 03:16:13 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB158830E; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-116-82.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.82]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D5C608F6; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:16:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Lutomirski , "the arch\/x86 maintainers" , Linux List Kernel Mailing , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Peter Anvin , Peter Zijlstra , bp@alien8.de, vapier@gentoo.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com, dalias@libc.org, x32@buildd.debian.org, Arnd Bergmann , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: Can we drop upstream Linux x32 support? References: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:16:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:40:33 -0800") Message-ID: <871s6o32d6.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds: > Apparently the main real use case is for extreme benchmarking. It's > the only use-case where the complexity of maintaining a whole > development environment and distro is worth it, it seems. Apparently a > number of Spec submissions have been done with the x32 model. Are you sure GCC was used for that? ICC has a 32-bit pointer mode which does not change the (64-bit) kernel interface. Thanks, Florian