Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 06/16] lib: fdt: add a helper function for handling
 memory range property
To:     "AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
References: <20181115055254.2812-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
 <20181115055254.2812-7-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
 <CAL_JsqL4_Z5pVfoB3opjL7eTzZvhBJW7_aQS443quAAR0gGH1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181206155424.GA4422@arm.com>
 <681e1265-2f0c-2a62-3778-09911b2be7fc@arm.com>
 <20181211061715.GF21466@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, dyoung@redhat.com,
        Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        prudo@linux.ibm.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        bhsharma@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
From:   James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Message-ID: <654bffae-7edb-bda4-d01d-99a8b455b186@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:09:07 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181211061715.GF21466@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Akashi,

On 11/12/2018 06:17, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:12:47AM +0000, James Morse wrote:
>> On 06/12/2018 15:54, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:47:04AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:52 PM AKASHI Takahiro
>>>> <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Added function, fdt_setprop_reg(), will be used later to handle
>>>>> kexec-specific property in arm64's kexec_file implementation.
>>>>> It will possibly be merged into libfdt in the future.
>>>>
>>>> You generally can't modify libfdt files. Any changes will be blown
>>>> away with the next dtc sync (there's one in -next now). Though here
>>>> you are creating a new location with fdt code. lib/ is just a shim to
>>>> the actual libfdt code. Don't put any implementation there. You can
>>>> add this to drivers/of/fdt_address.c for the short term, but it still
>>>> needs to go upstream.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, the implementation looks fine to me.
>>>
>>> I agree, but I don't think there's a real need for us to hack
>>> drivers/of/fdt_address.c in the meantime -- let's just target upstream
>>> and not carry this in the kernel.
>>>
>>> Akashi -- for now, I'll drop the kdump parts of this series which rely
>>> on this helper. The majority of the series is actually independent and
>>> can go in as-is.
>>>
>>> I've pushed out a kexec branch to the arm64 tree for you to take a look
>>> at:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kexec
>>
>> I gave this a quick spin. Without the elfcorehdr/usable-memory-range arm64 needs
>> to explicitly forbid kdump via kexec_file_load. (like powerpc does already).
> 
> Thank you for pointing this out.
> 
>> Without this kdump works, but the second kernel overwrites the first as those DT
>> properties are missing.
>>
>> I'll post a patch momentarily,
> 
> Fine, but anyhow I'm going to submit a new version (*without* kdump),
> I will fix the issue along with others.

I had a quick look at the arm64 for-next/core branch. Will has queued the
non-kdump parts of this series.

If you have changes, they need to be against the arm64 tree.


Thanks,

James