Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 79/91] virtio/s390: fix race in ccw_io_helper()
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:41:38 +0100
Message-Id: <20181211151613.033769641@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181211151606.026852373@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181211151606.026852373@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>

commit 78b1a52e05c9db11d293342e8d6d8a230a04b4e7 upstream.

While ccw_io_helper() seems like intended to be exclusive in a sense that
it is supposed to facilitate I/O for at most one thread at any given
time, there is actually nothing ensuring that threads won't pile up at
vcdev->wait_q. If they do, all threads get woken up and see the status
that belongs to some other request than their own. This can lead to bugs.
For an example see:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1788432

This race normally does not cause any problems. The operations provided
by struct virtio_config_ops are usually invoked in a well defined
sequence, normally don't fail, and are normally used quite infrequent
too.

Yet, if some of the these operations are directly triggered via sysfs
attributes, like in the case described by the referenced bug, userspace
is given an opportunity to force races by increasing the frequency of the
given operations.

Let us fix the problem by ensuring, that for each device, we finish
processing the previous request before starting with a new one.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Message-Id: <20180925121309.58524-3-pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct virtio_ccw_device {
 	unsigned int revision; /* Transport revision */
 	wait_queue_head_t wait_q;
 	spinlock_t lock;
+	struct mutex io_lock; /* Serializes I/O requests */
 	struct list_head virtqueues;
 	unsigned long indicators;
 	unsigned long indicators2;
@@ -307,6 +308,7 @@ static int ccw_io_helper(struct virtio_c
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int flag = intparm & VIRTIO_CCW_INTPARM_MASK;
 
+	mutex_lock(&vcdev->io_lock);
 	do {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(get_ccwdev_lock(vcdev->cdev), flags);
 		ret = ccw_device_start(vcdev->cdev, ccw, intparm, 0, 0);
@@ -319,7 +321,9 @@ static int ccw_io_helper(struct virtio_c
 		cpu_relax();
 	} while (ret == -EBUSY);
 	wait_event(vcdev->wait_q, doing_io(vcdev, flag) == 0);
-	return ret ? ret : vcdev->err;
+	ret = ret ? ret : vcdev->err;
+	mutex_unlock(&vcdev->io_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
@@ -1236,6 +1240,7 @@ static int virtio_ccw_online(struct ccw_
 	init_waitqueue_head(&vcdev->wait_q);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcdev->virtqueues);
 	spin_lock_init(&vcdev->lock);
+	mutex_init(&vcdev->io_lock);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(get_ccwdev_lock(cdev), flags);
 	dev_set_drvdata(&cdev->dev, vcdev);