Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp999857imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:56:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XKVFCmrXu/PBQdmj4vdDySjJilFriO7DVKEs5adBzzu9XCBpFRcN5mh4/jJmHJTahdL0GF X-Received: by 2002:a62:6143:: with SMTP id v64mr17378555pfb.142.1544554603914; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:56:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544554603; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Rrwm4AuekRCmAjVhTO41N4Hw4NmkXr00hoebnGnmjTByPBXmtq7EAB0Y0Jz4mA3UmF j9lPLinZeljbNsJ2TFMnxhxNpUE+2BdQN5BhdPMyAxXOQ/uhYOeeNwEl9EDKpEurGJJA 2Rfsqb55QEIt/Db+QDdzT62ey10DmT2//Yc8xFFUsT7Q2UUEOwZMW8O4N3452ZjZl8nP VrLRTwDzDbErnVZbFGM4ymz7nX4AHVspF9DivbJzInU9zVkXIFG7GWg7JvBK2OSoTC4M MtuU9ADZ646WhqJTNNDtHpQ5MnS6l/Aws906k3nWFLnp6XRbsfcDnQCzo/TWkYlZUKVP i+NQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Mp1SRtZzEwAGpb2qE9L2l96y//ET6XC5DhUuLKSBeIo=; b=E+6xtu6kilVGj2ajgMEQQduAfRZXSUhGZ3BH/rbNBGUYNpt/b8Im5zR/5w+3MgCpf8 rLjDsa6XfnGcLkd2gr+aGZm94gUhkM79ksm12EX4D41da2v7DJSlQzDipGOZJHHjMQRt goXvYssz4dt4cVJIUTU23rtfyszvbdm49zAuN9RczSNAYHc678YwP9Aj2+7sI+m34R+z DIt4lR0rT62hkLNoMMiYQuhqh2HnGMvOY+x6nBKHKwE7xstYpRjdmFgQ4wCDcA8dHCy0 ZmG06hpRB7pdfdnMuwn80PFheKZsQ6771CTSP/D1vN2+PFChASjPTw7HYeb0bmxfKFzW 3Ebg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=VRRt9Q1h; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i5si12416290pgg.279.2018.12.11.10.56.28; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:56:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=VRRt9Q1h; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726819AbeLKSy5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:54:57 -0500 Received: from mail-it1-f194.google.com ([209.85.166.194]:36060 "EHLO mail-it1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726241AbeLKSy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:54:56 -0500 Received: by mail-it1-f194.google.com with SMTP id c9so5636950itj.1 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:54:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mp1SRtZzEwAGpb2qE9L2l96y//ET6XC5DhUuLKSBeIo=; b=VRRt9Q1hozbqu1fR0e8aIk3HznGRKB+flAYmwSlaWkGA51+nhw9NK/jDz4/DqE10It ZK2OY5OGNJFYG0RF1LnKcLWvTLryo23FgRWUB69VFepR0KeQXGIYsRmNN9bnqP4Sk69m Bh0UkJGnXbC/UAyD7L8QKo8I74d5xBmBFOV4RuCqRM1GF6AY8Qe7xwSCb57ISPgW5z83 P36k/pM3UnciF9Pzfmsx7aBxcppu/qsF0G4Wsqv4aD6r2BCr6y9mMbXsL1qWssEpErGR gAVVcGuPhDo8O7XdprV5WRVUCqj38F0Ge0u7cQiiA3W2lVKxP+i94YAD+74BHTXEEPfk /UzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mp1SRtZzEwAGpb2qE9L2l96y//ET6XC5DhUuLKSBeIo=; b=j4HH31nkq36BbbGn11gdUa1h9yfQxGSilVJw8TeKHTcFwLUUovZrC6Nqf3WPxcT0yW sfGZxszmEKAL1rDwrEanQWTZPhl4P/ESOch5a5iAfwCADG7C+cLiNc3KDMQD06S2NWGh NW0u/DjQn0r2KZQjjGyLcnMJgIquQalQLcbl02D174DY6FZNf7uFhLVMXHI9CwQSJSWO Sj7LrcNBS0qmLiST4pu8PxZBHQjA1GbVpcp34j7m7lLmjmJ1MEMaCix6jT7IrgSwevvZ yVbIqQa2N8DyGoxgL6OdMH3yO34/XcUAAzWlVOUVmkqv0eWphyQwjYSIVC8o/+jPrVov MtZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYmE9GtmbuRKnZkxlxeP+DLf+gmQp5SJNts+PyfTN8irzksDTWN Imj63ClLj9amKXrWg8CKDODTUw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:7fc3:: with SMTP id r186mr2819026itc.178.1544554495528; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.56] ([216.160.245.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm2592600itv.20.2018.12.11.10.54.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:54:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Convert ioctx_table to XArray To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Al Viro , Benjamin LaHaise , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , fsdevel , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-mm , linux-kernel , Dan Carpenter References: <20181128183531.5139-1-willy@infradead.org> <09e3d156-66fc-ca17-efac-63f080a27a1d@kernel.dk> <20181211184553.GH6830@bombadil.infradead.org> <75267003-9407-101f-33ee-685e345a2c8a@kernel.dk> <20181211185311.GJ6830@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <1629a25c-a9e7-e731-230d-e179e9f7a9a7@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:54:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181211185311.GJ6830@bombadil.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/18 11:53 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:46:53AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 12/11/18 11:45 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> I think we need the rcu read lock here to prevent ctx from being freed >>> under us by free_ioctx(). >> >> Then that begs the question, how about __xa_load() that is already called >> under RCU read lock? > > I've been considering adding it to the API, yes. I was under the > impression that nested rcu_read_lock() calls were not expensive, even > with CONFIG_PREEMPT. They are not expensive, but they are not free either. And if we know we are already under a rcu read lock, it seems pretty pointless. For the two cases (memremap and aio), the rcu read lock is right there, before the call. Easy to verify that it's safe. -- Jens Axboe