Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1112288imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:57:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WjxPaJDAiDcBx4iAKi66TDcs5v/43YGGdx9ooBG5k6ojalhsw6ze1viw9nP1Mj3O3hF28A X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d202:: with SMTP id t2mr17735127ply.193.1544561842944; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:57:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544561842; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fEPBCeJUYXlUlT5HIFsXZ7/r5MnrKdYBVWX14nJIVKPpjiTcygh4/6pCUjTzdR7q2x 8KqCXpoQx3128NkTHUjkYrKwKEonDIgidqv3d6Jp0vBWVVRmisg1sXJiQNy8CddJq+fs V0a7Pa5r9ZFilLhQ1DS3wNc0GLqdlrSUYDbbuG8xWpABWM0iz5fRKOB6cfg3i/s4wPUH WlhGwLalFshGTm2xdSc71+97v+pxKH2Fz3FmQvPe7qQXPgAXcE1oBzSdaQiAcawHvVZM LNhHxinKJeV6BJVUQXkPyVGgTEQNHrghZdytYi0SqRXtOCIYjgnKhtoujv1h/5dqW5oR /7MA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=quQtJ5MxqBTi6s6ahE+jfOBa3Q8O2AQizDaX3e7kIIk=; b=X9buElg9+BzT9zKSQC5KNdfdgAj5hKRlmL4KqGWUhUFfLvLaJPEJsSFtcUN/0hgaHK iWS15M01SkUsZlKk/xiE7EZxdN0zydezzWgJwK9nB/UXPXsEGMiC4VFDr3MRj9T1Tyjq 8Kvi6yXyc5FS7ItFr+A3vBLhdgVd1yulEloEXvfX17x4QSoi85TFVd3rBqMr3ptlQWVQ 1W0Q+wnzlzWIKHgFlVp4B4M9tA5yiYSpjeG9WIzy5dGJF4MxjoTyZYCTftwV0Mfcb8Ol /4+PIo6WZ3/9KpGvpOa/qaom/44Ust+whcszjzNIScFa305kwY/WBt5sgkxfFWOIet9K EqTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 20si13862178pft.177.2018.12.11.12.57.07; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726389AbeLKUys (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:54:48 -0500 Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:45808 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726136AbeLKUys (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:54:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (p54B334A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.52.167]) by pokefinder.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5F234C0E8F; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:54:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:54:44 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Parthiban Nallathambi Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@cubietech.com, thomas.liau@actions-semi.com, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S700 I2C support Message-ID: <20181211205444.rpfn5cmsndy4y2lv@ninjato> References: <20181211080448.24007-1-pn@denx.de> <20181211080448.24007-4-pn@denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45isqxjr4vjntdmi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181211080448.24007-4-pn@denx.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --45isqxjr4vjntdmi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:04:47AM +0100, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote: > Add S700 to the list of devices supported by Owl I2C driver. >=20 > Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S700 I2C driver. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam Rob, is this okay or should we drop this patch and update the DT to contain first the s700 compatible and then s900 as fallback? > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c > index 96b4572e6d9c..b6b5a495118b 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c > @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ static int owl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > =20 > static const struct of_device_id owl_i2c_of_match[] =3D { > + { .compatible =3D "actions,s700-i2c" }, > { .compatible =3D "actions,s900-i2c" }, > { /* sentinel */ } > }; > --=20 > 2.17.2 >=20 --45isqxjr4vjntdmi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAlwQJA8ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYC5w//aduy+YzaN8BUpjKgg9R2sXqoXAc22xC6MfkvASLpCMVL2mdw7eNnUgOr nkTSKS633l8l1yDzzFdreOMwk0LTYnJzEFwKKAUr/zDHmGZYfWjpx/cS8MhCHv+K 48V+gniY04EpacNvTmQssPGEIF6KDmdCxmacqBISLwVe1Npx5AF3IUxyosoyysv4 +ANDuF+Z3S6yOWnQcoXLHJ8iViSSSPXqoaJ0Jm+bUgZB+5osQbSL+viKsPze2aLA 30wTLJmm4qG3fHewozjO3qxkTTu1JTlvAPZmNB0g8jYRoZ/zlgr1FYC5I1B1ET/K L8MKvLQfqPjczCJ/4joyl1TyVoikaTg98LYTghcnBe0P/pxSQknz+QHTAXwfsJU+ 4xKOPyMpEPSjfIdmcWiWVhd1zXW3/R/lU33Tiw8VumMhK/oan9GHuef9IVmtFMbE wRf9eR9JXJgIjNObQJ8c/EKy3PnGjwLOFCt6bSPJ7llGstE6JvcUYlZXbxQp4kNa IdLiOUFxwykCOxrnS0ZuMUSwJaKRxQQrteD+dEuH/lQEiOcD8iAPDYTRxdajoOPB Ga5Uw4VvM4oShExTlxKfPkhO4tv7NZ503SEFBEnpMo0SFFny+MVCIAERJmB2QkL2 QZdp7gZpsfNxzrNueaUtL92mLNrmrfmhDwQ8rE6tTl8Jb+cHMxI= =cRo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45isqxjr4vjntdmi--