Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1131209imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:16:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UzTzF4SoxKgkSmiaYooCwPpVgq/XvzWEfeNZq0b7fwW9MGDiXOR1+KBfFumE6la788EJs7 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8286:: with SMTP id s6mr17467590pfm.63.1544562998216; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:16:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544562998; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c/TFhEimf5DxZnrWIe6Lt3+TlmUn+QuHjFv+F8xCAWGTpxikbTumCFMIAYuXkQRn0C f8sDmyVNca/W6o3Sgk+jCgwrPsMle9RBeFxfuaRslQRff94MHssgAzwAYsm/Xs+L9w4A eGc1JmK4sqmZGtYaetQmoGeblaxfxix8nIm67NedXRf0wOD0gFQ6NQwozJ6SQ1Pj8Y1L NkqAAOJWdT6YjDvFSArNqqf1fGzNPbpO7YOk4R/pzaGs3x1WntBc5rbpx2RYOsJLyC5N CX1JhNnt/ddhGiwbbOiILji93oZhXEqZXNaCmcKiunKmRnAVFcnE2q3oQOVMR+3EA8LP wLAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=OWlzu+pEcWzxVTq4PBsTLwjug0rHa7CeEePRtD2j6dY=; b=Dd4wy0M1DM8jQR8Xcdl2Gz+y7WSSBcxXOiOIL8V9CeqxstLpUsgds9anO+OwJtblQc 4Oc2/CFkErRIulO/rbc5/lWKJtZpr//rj652k/zIb8teKluG23tVbbd88fWY6zvA030E 6gC+nP3qTrvWBVkQ1jfUEQhqj5tg7WJ374G6GIzYjzk3nrENIAoLFxlSnQuplnSBMmNJ Tnp5x4NnBg9QrvLanxe/aczmwBMfPcKPlPkjV9rQXqGCp1Xio7yq+aJXPGVNxxe1kpmK tqzTV5m9AS8O/fWsLoBTEF3sd6+HVrppTU5bFFLBSF9Vg5lblgZE7z1kLpLWfppChR73 Bbig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z8si11922700pgf.577.2018.12.11.13.16.22; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726220AbeLKVPX (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:15:23 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34390 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726134AbeLKVPX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:15:23 -0500 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0334BB35; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:15:19 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Josef Bacik Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] filemap: drop the mmap_sem for all blocking operations Message-Id: <20181211131519.8d9e91eac049f16dad7c2d1f@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181211173801.29535-4-josef@toxicpanda.com> References: <20181211173801.29535-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> <20181211173801.29535-4-josef@toxicpanda.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:01 -0500 Josef Bacik wrote: > Currently we only drop the mmap_sem if there is contention on the page > lock. The idea is that we issue readahead and then go to lock the page > while it is under IO and we want to not hold the mmap_sem during the IO. > > The problem with this is the assumption that the readahead does > anything. In the case that the box is under extreme memory or IO > pressure we may end up not reading anything at all for readahead, which > means we will end up reading in the page under the mmap_sem. > > Even if the readahead does something, it could get throttled because of > io pressure on the system and the process is in a lower priority cgroup. > > Holding the mmap_sem while doing IO is problematic because it can cause > system-wide priority inversions. Consider some large company that does > a lot of web traffic. This large company has load balancing logic in > it's core web server, cause some engineer thought this was a brilliant > plan. This load balancing logic gets statistics from /proc about the > system, which trip over processes mmap_sem for various reasons. Now the > web server application is in a protected cgroup, but these other > processes may not be, and if they are being throttled while their > mmap_sem is held we'll stall, and cause this nice death spiral. > > Instead rework filemap fault path to drop the mmap sem at any point that > we may do IO or block for an extended period of time. This includes > while issuing readahead, locking the page, or needing to call ->readpage > because readahead did not occur. Then once we have a fully uptodate > page we can return with VM_FAULT_RETRY and come back again to find our > nicely in-cache page that was gotten outside of the mmap_sem. > > This patch also adds a new helper for locking the page with the mmap_sem > dropped. This doesn't make sense currently as generally speaking if the > page is already locked it'll have been read in (unless there was an > error) before it was unlocked. However a forthcoming patchset will > change this with the ability to abort read-ahead bio's if necessary, > making it more likely that we could contend for a page lock and still > have a not uptodate page. This allows us to deal with this case by > grabbing the lock and issuing the IO without the mmap_sem held, and then > returning VM_FAULT_RETRY to come back around. > > ... > > --- a/mm/filemap.c > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > @@ -2304,28 +2304,76 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_file_read_iter); > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > #define MMAP_LOTSAMISS (100) > +static struct file *maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(struct vm_fault *vmf, > + struct file *fpin) > +{ > + int flags = vmf->flags; > + if (fpin) > + return fpin; I think a comment here wouldn't hurt: explain waht's going on, why we're handling the fault flag in this fashion. That's kinda covered in the lock_page_maybe_drop_mmap() description, but this code is fairly tricky-looking. > + if ((flags & (FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT)) == > + FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY) { > + fpin = get_file(vmf->vma->vm_file); > + up_read(&vmf->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem); > + } > + return fpin; > +} > + > +/* > + * Works similar to lock_page_or_retry, except it will pin the file and drop the > + * mmap_sem if necessary and then lock the page, and return 1 in this case. This isn't true in the case where the trylock_page() succeeded. Can we expand on that case here? > + * This means the caller needs to deal with the fpin appropriately. 0 return is > + * the same as in lock_page_or_retry. > + */ > +static int lock_page_maybe_drop_mmap(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, > + struct file **fpin) > +{ > + if (trylock_page(page)) > + return 1; > + > + *fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, *fpin); > + if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT) > + return 0; maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io() doesn't do anything if FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT was set, so can we swap the above two statements? > + if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE) { > + if (__lock_page_killable(page)) { > + /* > + * We didn't have the right flags to drop the mmap_sem, > + * but all fault_handlers only check for fatal signals > + * if we return VM_FAULT_RETRY, so we need to drop the > + * mmap_sem here and return 0 if we don't have a fpin. > + */ > + if (*fpin == NULL) > + up_read(&vmf->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem); > + return 0; > + } > + } else > + __lock_page(page); > + return 1; > +} > + > > /* > * Synchronous readahead happens when we don't even find > * a page in the page cache at all. > */ > -static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf) > +static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf) Let's explain the newly-added return value in the comment? Under what circumstances is it NULL, etc. > { > struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file; > struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra; > struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; > + struct file *fpin = NULL; > pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff; > > /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */ > if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ) > - return; > + return fpin; > if (!ra->ra_pages) > - return; > + return fpin; > > if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SEQ_READ) { > + fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin); > page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset, > ra->ra_pages); > - return; > + return fpin; > } > > /* Avoid banging the cache line if not needed */ > @@ -2337,37 +2385,43 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf) > * stop bothering with read-ahead. It will only hurt. > */ > if (ra->mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS) > - return; > + return fpin; > > /* > * mmap read-around > */ > + fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin); > ra->start = max_t(long, 0, offset - ra->ra_pages / 2); > ra->size = ra->ra_pages; > ra->async_size = ra->ra_pages / 4; > ra_submit(ra, mapping, file); > + return fpin; > } > > /* > * Asynchronous readahead happens when we find the page and PG_readahead, > * so we want to possibly extend the readahead further.. > */ > -static void do_async_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf, > - struct page *page) > +static struct file *do_async_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf, > + struct page *page) > { > struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file; > struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra; > struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; > + struct file *fpin = NULL; > pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff; > > /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */ > if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ) > - return; > + return fpin; > if (ra->mmap_miss > 0) > ra->mmap_miss--; > - if (PageReadahead(page)) > + if (PageReadahead(page)) { > + fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin); > page_cache_async_readahead(mapping, ra, file, > page, offset, ra->ra_pages); > + } > + return fpin; > } > > /** > @@ -2397,6 +2451,7 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > { > int error; > struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file; > + struct file *fpin = NULL; > struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; > struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra; > struct inode *inode = mapping->host; > @@ -2418,10 +2473,10 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > * We found the page, so try async readahead before > * waiting for the lock. > */ > - do_async_mmap_readahead(vmf, page); > + fpin = do_async_mmap_readahead(vmf, page); > } else if (!page) { > /* No page in the page cache at all */ > - do_sync_mmap_readahead(vmf); > + fpin = do_sync_mmap_readahead(vmf); > count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT); > count_memcg_event_mm(vmf->vma->vm_mm, PGMAJFAULT); > ret = VM_FAULT_MAJOR; > @@ -2433,7 +2488,7 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > return vmf_error(-ENOMEM); hm, how does this work. We might have taken a ref on the file and that ref is recorded in fpin but an error here causes us to lose track of that elevated refcount? > } > > - if (!lock_page_or_retry(page, vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags)) { > + if (!lock_page_maybe_drop_mmap(vmf, page, &fpin)) { > put_page(page); > return ret | VM_FAULT_RETRY; > } > @@ -2453,6 +2508,16 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page))) > goto page_not_uptodate; > > + /* > + * We've made it this far and we had to drop our mmap_sem, now is the > + * time to return to the upper layer and have it re-find the vma and > + * redo the fault. > + */ > + if (fpin) { > + unlock_page(page); > + goto out_retry; > + } > + > /* > * Found the page and have a reference on it. > * We must recheck i_size under page lock. > @@ -2475,12 +2540,15 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > * and we need to check for errors. > */ > ClearPageError(page); > + fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin); > error = mapping->a_ops->readpage(file, page); > if (!error) { > wait_on_page_locked(page); > if (!PageUptodate(page)) > error = -EIO; > } > + if (fpin) > + goto out_retry; > put_page(page); > > if (!error || error == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE) > @@ -2489,6 +2557,18 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > /* Things didn't work out. Return zero to tell the mm layer so. */ > shrink_readahead_size_eio(file, ra); > return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; > + > +out_retry: > + /* > + * We dropped the mmap_sem, we need to return to the fault handler to > + * re-find the vma and come back and find our hopefully still populated > + * page. > + */ > + if (page) > + put_page(page); > + if (fpin) > + fput(fpin); > + return ret | VM_FAULT_RETRY; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fault);