Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265619AbUATTn4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:43:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265639AbUATTn4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:43:56 -0500 Received: from mail3.absamail.co.za ([196.35.40.69]:7211 "EHLO absamail.co.za") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265619AbUATTnx (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:43:53 -0500 Subject: RE: [2.6.1 MCE falseness?] Hardware reports non-fatal error From: Niel Lambrechts To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074627735.4414.10.camel@ksyrium.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:43:42 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 976 Lines: 29 I tried the mentioned patch, with a modification for my CPU type, but still get the problem: "Jan 20 21:30:23 ksyrium kernel: MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU 0. Jan 20 21:30:23 ksyrium kernel: MCE: startbank = 1, vendor : 0, x86 = 6, model = 9, mask = 5. Jan 20 21:30:23 ksyrium kernel: Bank 1: f200000000000185" As you can see, I added a little extra debugging info. Here is the relevant portion of the code: " if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD && boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6) || (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL && boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 9 && boot_cpu_data.x86_mask == 5)) startbank = 1;" Comments would be appreciated. -Niel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/