Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1189608imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:27:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XQBuoEQouwc7rMenCujMG4McLez0q895/CYzmXEuCO/+QXs95QWqzue7zClEONPkXNTRkw X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b707:: with SMTP id d7mr16816933pls.29.1544567227914; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:27:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544567227; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=stzD50gq60YwwmJGPp6NY3jaYdlhBoz5ANK7dCkD33+JVgTzXnm2UL3dfrIi8yCJgv Is9R4i1Tc8oU/kJmCxWR/VaHKts7HYXnWLUkMXY+TJg7UcmOskj1P8JJDzTXOYJ54AMk dKsSQIlG7odWJ3CsbNT1nX/hrAc80zZoVfnKwE2uqIGW+rb5yiDOh50FUekLY169qFLU nceiavmegyGR+w8XMEn7WuK7pjRIUQWvTVA+8ve2KtlurGfCS1I1RKk6j1fIufUwFcpl CXsq7ZBFKzKna/d9F7c94TnI0u2x0X+HBER/NYgm4QTV34BqK7myd9A37M2rwl8DSLv3 lP9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=8uUdsblMIddf6IwBUyUc92bt1cpVeTZ3VH6vc0o9XVM=; b=KlI/hb7DioN93xvu0eBPOJsP19b6syIqPCMR7+M/H3qC4c7v47djS3w5CCHvALCOGJ 8WJKxkQwZC10gKSYgOazKVYoKg59ZXQWZN98BAzhNqd1BfIbBSJN16KwrkyThz/UdfiZ eGVHuI9Fmv50HwsiPg7Gg10MPztVGYpInw6SK9j9LU8HCb0uCUEK15YDkAefzZARe4wY MlM6fWuYR2x8YR9edRR08u9au9TVFIwl7uij8VolyxdJTaDGs67iwyrQFjZUrP47/DcK c+9bBZp+HVeRK7TYb78P+ot97HOOaVj6MAc5ccC8ZfuYSuho4BD3gOmmomJsROQBA0oV TeLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v20si12358432pgk.103.2018.12.11.14.26.53; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726267AbeLKWYx (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:24:53 -0500 Received: from mail.hallyn.com ([178.63.66.53]:59758 "EHLO mail.hallyn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726183AbeLKWYx (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:24:53 -0500 Received: by mail.hallyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 390DFC32; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:24:49 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:24:49 -0600 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Tycho Andersen Cc: Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W . Biederman" , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Christian Brauner , Tyler Hicks , Akihiro Suda , Aleksa Sarai , Jann Horn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap Message-ID: <20181211222449.GA937@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20181209182414.30862-1-tycho@tycho.ws> <20181209182414.30862-5-tycho@tycho.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181209182414.30862-5-tycho@tycho.ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 11:24:14AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > The idea here is just to give a demonstration of how one could safely use > the SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF feature to do mount policies. This particular > policy is (as noted in the comment) not very interesting, but it serves to > illustrate how one might apply a policy dodging the various TOCTOU issues. > > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen > CC: Kees Cook > CC: Andy Lutomirski > CC: Oleg Nesterov > CC: Eric W. Biederman > CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" > CC: Christian Brauner > CC: Tyler Hicks > CC: Akihiro Suda > --- > v5: new in v5 > v7: updates for v7 API changes > v8: * add some more comments about what's happening in main() (Kees) > * move from ptrace API to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER > v9: * s/mknod/mount in error message > * switch to the SECCOMP_GET_NOTIF_SIZES API > * add a note about getting ENOENT from SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND > --- > samples/seccomp/.gitignore | 1 + > samples/seccomp/Makefile | 7 +- > samples/seccomp/user-trap.c | 375 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 382 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > index 78fb78184291..d1e2e817d556 100644 > --- a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > +++ b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > bpf-direct > bpf-fancy > dropper > +user-trap > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/Makefile b/samples/seccomp/Makefile > index cf34ff6b4065..4920903c8009 100644 > --- a/samples/seccomp/Makefile > +++ b/samples/seccomp/Makefile > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > ifndef CROSS_COMPILE > -hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct > +hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct user-trap > > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > bpf-direct-objs := bpf-direct.o > > +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > +user-trap-objs := user-trap.o > + > # Try to match the kernel target. > ifndef CONFIG_64BIT > > @@ -33,6 +37,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += $(MFLAG) > HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-direct += $(MFLAG) > HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-fancy += $(MFLAG) > HOSTLDLIBS_dropper += $(MFLAG) > +HOSTLDLIBS_user-trap += $(MFLAG) > endif > always := $(hostprogs-m) > endif > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..61267cb59c8e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c > @@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x))) > + > +static int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args) > +{ > + errno = 0; > + return syscall(__NR_seccomp, op, flags, args); > +} > + > +static int send_fd(int sock, int fd) > +{ > + struct msghdr msg = {}; > + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; > + char buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))] = {0}, c = 'c'; > + struct iovec io = { > + .iov_base = &c, > + .iov_len = 1, > + }; > + > + msg.msg_iov = &io; > + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; > + msg.msg_control = buf; > + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf); > + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); > + cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; > + cmsg->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; > + cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int)); > + *((int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg)) = fd; > + msg.msg_controllen = cmsg->cmsg_len; > + > + if (sendmsg(sock, &msg, 0) < 0) { > + perror("sendmsg"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int recv_fd(int sock) > +{ > + struct msghdr msg = {}; > + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; > + char buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))] = {0}, c = 'c'; > + struct iovec io = { > + .iov_base = &c, > + .iov_len = 1, > + }; > + > + msg.msg_iov = &io; > + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; > + msg.msg_control = buf; > + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf); > + > + if (recvmsg(sock, &msg, 0) < 0) { > + perror("recvmsg"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); > + > + return *((int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg)); > +} > + > +static int user_trap_syscall(int nr, unsigned int flags) > +{ > + struct sock_filter filter[] = { > + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, > + offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), > + BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1), > + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF), > + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), > + }; > + > + struct sock_fprog prog = { > + .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter), > + .filter = filter, > + }; > + > + return seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &prog); > +} > + > +static int handle_req(struct seccomp_notif *req, > + struct seccomp_notif_resp *resp, int listener) > +{ > + char path[PATH_MAX], source[PATH_MAX], target[PATH_MAX]; > + int ret = -1, mem; > + > + resp->id = req->id; > + resp->error = -EPERM; > + resp->val = 0; > + > + if (req->data.nr != __NR_mount) { > + fprintf(stderr, "huh? trapped something besides mount? %d\n", req->data.nr); > + return -1; > + } > + > + /* Only allow bind mounts. */ > + if (!(req->data.args[3] & MS_BIND)) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Ok, let's read the task's memory to see where they wanted their > + * mount to go. > + */ > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/proc/%d/mem", req->pid); > + mem = open(path, O_RDONLY); > + if (mem < 0) { > + perror("open mem"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + /* > + * Now we avoid a TOCTOU: we referred to a pid by its pid, but since > + * the pid that made the syscall may have died, we need to confirm that > + * the pid is still valid after we open its /proc/pid/mem file. We can > + * ask the listener fd this as follows. > + * > + * Note that this check should occur *after* any task-specific > + * resources are opened, to make sure that the task has not died and > + * we're not wrongly reading someone else's state in order to make > + * decisions. > + */ > + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID, &req->id) < 0) { > + fprintf(stderr, "task died before we could map its memory\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* > + * Phew, we've got the right /proc/pid/mem. Now we can read it. Note > + * that to avoid another TOCTOU, we should read all of the pointer args > + * before we decide to allow the syscall. > + */ > + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[0], SEEK_SET) < 0) { > + perror("seek"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = read(mem, source, sizeof(source)); > + if (ret < 0) { > + perror("read"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[1], SEEK_SET) < 0) { > + perror("seek"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = read(mem, target, sizeof(target)); > + if (ret < 0) { > + perror("read"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* > + * Our policy is to only allow bind mounts inside /tmp. This isn't very > + * interesting, because we could do unprivlieged bind mounts with user > + * namespaces already, but you get the idea. > + */ > + if (!strncmp(source, "/tmp", 4) && !strncmp(target, "/tmp", 4)) { Of course the host could have a /tmproot or somesuch, so you might want to check the first 5 characters :)