Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:43:08 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc:     luto@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, hpa@zytor.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
        x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP
Message-ID: <20181211234308.GW27375@zn.tnic>
References: <20181211233753.GA26593@avx2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181211233753.GA26593@avx2>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:37:53AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> I have a question: does alternatives ordering matter?

Yes.

> CPU can have both features.

The last present feature wins.

> And other code in this file uses "c" for clobber.

Ok.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.