Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1292137imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:48:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/X1/Vovo3UmrYqJDML0eculBjvKkCa6rxCJimy1rrwfGc8gTvOJBIuXHmu3yov+qJyYiKjT X-Received: by 2002:a62:42d4:: with SMTP id h81mr18290040pfd.259.1544575732284; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:48:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544575732; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XG2abvSDi4s4Bugi8UZZxQ8/oJsWZY/dayjnzeTBJ1Cheh31DY7BvFq8829JXzxTVN I8rTbmKam+Yv4IHPVaxJhQgmFYGY51tHrWe3NKKhxLG6okKvb4th5yl0g0Xe1EeVLvbV nwlQARF75ZLsiF1d8XkBf4irGSIiM1cUev/M2uiay30PFnPx9YC/c8OLmTpZ3dsV0YKo wkTwwdGwCdXhnVVsJNlYNbrgu6qhWWd/1t1QF5Casb/e9eAXhDQcrJX4xvsm4FwnY0KL XJXdMiI9ApfbE5YWQqmZubBYfJAMlek5HVGlg3/2tnZMgSe8CWanzSoJUxcvnnUGpNHw OLdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=dvqNIjhJ38H7XHYFmTTGv779swRsELVAegwnTwqcZxg=; b=YE6cl7WHUR64bwYkifEGgolvdLHFukHHkfsk8EdDxVd9nqBWTfvuFCt7uWvHNtB/ya /bjcaQcDmD/ptvcMZH/hnaUQxxfh7PJZCj2+L1VXpU2CQkG8hUezm8Ng8r6mZSPkDBeP wOuvNFLrOQvdC5jqkBHQtP16wFIe3umRQamGovOXP/H8LkDeXYQ521qFQqRR/eiyhvQ+ Y+yRQO2BUDIsLGJ5cYE0zIu8Cn0WnlnH8i9nYqMtccYq+1WZm4AU59Q0Ec/dz2xCKxkH ptq3gXF7U7AGtO0XXuYIFLQ7g/moIPEggb91zznN1OV01Xu60CA9NyJyZn48FzVupLTn 2e3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=fwb0RljD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c11si13445756pgj.255.2018.12.11.16.48.31; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=fwb0RljD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726344AbeLLArG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:47:06 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-f195.google.com ([209.85.219.195]:38341 "EHLO mail-yb1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726234AbeLLArG (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:47:06 -0500 Received: by mail-yb1-f195.google.com with SMTP id d187so7550048ybb.5 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:47:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dvqNIjhJ38H7XHYFmTTGv779swRsELVAegwnTwqcZxg=; b=fwb0RljDTPFfTMwEdR9aXYYd64/x0qLy5wm3qXZsF9TPjlJcUzHBlOlemmMWmqGDvu +DPnyFJWrwa1W2aX4eufV0ySS7q3RqeyGHomYxBouzUzibaGZ1PUjT7DWZQw/O/FR1hc 88KFeatnhgsRZ19RKtYZf6rwZbM+zTLrUhuic= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dvqNIjhJ38H7XHYFmTTGv779swRsELVAegwnTwqcZxg=; b=uehRi2ZqBzNqEnW0LefJd4lcRP11uR9ywQY7WdNtyILbpm69eIq4w2XLRYWMrM4+WC lsuaxrE+mIpThnSyH+F+qTJ6uhb2Xgiro0YfWpPFti4ncTsF1/sG6nNZgOVktLTlkvuy +EKqKChDA3bu6no0f4OcoFKaAYoq5sfA3ukGE5LyChnC5w+EU8q3L8z/d55uXdB+ueVK 1g6TXz8WVn9zT2hAWicx2tkpqO83OgO884G4LeJwkih2cdyufU9bqLS+zp4bJvJf46ZF sEqf+703ZbWU9PAsxFHxALBnkpmdhWa8OlkhyvXjrjxGvrFWjO6Jj1/ynfR7o0qzg9z2 hmeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbUtc8wVb7WM1g6ABFK+DE/YfsPkxP7pgiv3tc1RFgS9YnfpEbU 76bLUBsk+oAKCFXPePAlgqpQcv2oIJk= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:30f:: with SMTP id j15-v6mr18629354ybp.371.1544575624930; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:47:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw1-f52.google.com (mail-yw1-f52.google.com. [209.85.161.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm5371457ywe.63.2018.12.11.16.47.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:47:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-f52.google.com with SMTP id g75so6274741ywb.1 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:47:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a81:29cc:: with SMTP id p195mr19359360ywp.407.1544575623495; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:47:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181209182414.30862-1-tycho@tycho.ws> <20181209182414.30862-5-tycho@tycho.ws> <20181211222449.GA937@mail.hallyn.com> In-Reply-To: <20181211222449.GA937@mail.hallyn.com> From: Kees Cook Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:46:52 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Tycho Andersen , Andy Lutomirski , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Christian Brauner , Tyler Hicks , Akihiro Suda , Aleksa Sarai , Jann Horn , LKML , Linux Containers , Linux API Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:24 PM Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 11:24:14AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > The idea here is just to give a demonstration of how one could safely use > > the SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF feature to do mount policies. This particular > > policy is (as noted in the comment) not very interesting, but it serves to > > illustrate how one might apply a policy dodging the various TOCTOU issues. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen > > CC: Kees Cook > > CC: Andy Lutomirski > > CC: Oleg Nesterov > > CC: Eric W. Biederman > > CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" > > CC: Christian Brauner > > CC: Tyler Hicks > > CC: Akihiro Suda > > --- > > v5: new in v5 > > v7: updates for v7 API changes > > v8: * add some more comments about what's happening in main() (Kees) > > * move from ptrace API to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER > > v9: * s/mknod/mount in error message > > * switch to the SECCOMP_GET_NOTIF_SIZES API > > * add a note about getting ENOENT from SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND > > --- > > samples/seccomp/.gitignore | 1 + > > samples/seccomp/Makefile | 7 +- > > samples/seccomp/user-trap.c | 375 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 382 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > > index 78fb78184291..d1e2e817d556 100644 > > --- a/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > > +++ b/samples/seccomp/.gitignore > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > > bpf-direct > > bpf-fancy > > dropper > > +user-trap > > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/Makefile b/samples/seccomp/Makefile > > index cf34ff6b4065..4920903c8009 100644 > > --- a/samples/seccomp/Makefile > > +++ b/samples/seccomp/Makefile > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > ifndef CROSS_COMPILE > > -hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct > > +hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_SECCOMP) := bpf-fancy dropper bpf-direct user-trap > > > > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > > @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > > HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-direct.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > > bpf-direct-objs := bpf-direct.o > > > > +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -I$(objtree)/usr/include > > +HOSTCFLAGS_user-trap.o += -idirafter $(objtree)/include > > +user-trap-objs := user-trap.o > > + > > # Try to match the kernel target. > > ifndef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > @@ -33,6 +37,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_bpf-fancy.o += $(MFLAG) > > HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-direct += $(MFLAG) > > HOSTLDLIBS_bpf-fancy += $(MFLAG) > > HOSTLDLIBS_dropper += $(MFLAG) > > +HOSTLDLIBS_user-trap += $(MFLAG) > > endif > > always := $(hostprogs-m) > > endif > > diff --git a/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..61267cb59c8e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x))) > > + > > +static int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args) > > +{ > > + errno = 0; > > + return syscall(__NR_seccomp, op, flags, args); > > +} > > + > > +static int send_fd(int sock, int fd) > > +{ > > + struct msghdr msg = {}; > > + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; > > + char buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))] = {0}, c = 'c'; > > + struct iovec io = { > > + .iov_base = &c, > > + .iov_len = 1, > > + }; > > + > > + msg.msg_iov = &io; > > + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; > > + msg.msg_control = buf; > > + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf); > > + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); > > + cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; > > + cmsg->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; > > + cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int)); > > + *((int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg)) = fd; > > + msg.msg_controllen = cmsg->cmsg_len; > > + > > + if (sendmsg(sock, &msg, 0) < 0) { > > + perror("sendmsg"); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int recv_fd(int sock) > > +{ > > + struct msghdr msg = {}; > > + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; > > + char buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))] = {0}, c = 'c'; > > + struct iovec io = { > > + .iov_base = &c, > > + .iov_len = 1, > > + }; > > + > > + msg.msg_iov = &io; > > + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; > > + msg.msg_control = buf; > > + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf); > > + > > + if (recvmsg(sock, &msg, 0) < 0) { > > + perror("recvmsg"); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); > > + > > + return *((int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg)); > > +} > > + > > +static int user_trap_syscall(int nr, unsigned int flags) > > +{ > > + struct sock_filter filter[] = { > > + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, > > + offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), > > + BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1), > > + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF), > > + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), > > + }; > > + > > + struct sock_fprog prog = { > > + .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter), > > + .filter = filter, > > + }; > > + > > + return seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &prog); > > +} > > + > > +static int handle_req(struct seccomp_notif *req, > > + struct seccomp_notif_resp *resp, int listener) > > +{ > > + char path[PATH_MAX], source[PATH_MAX], target[PATH_MAX]; > > + int ret = -1, mem; > > + > > + resp->id = req->id; > > + resp->error = -EPERM; > > + resp->val = 0; > > + > > + if (req->data.nr != __NR_mount) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "huh? trapped something besides mount? %d\n", req->data.nr); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > + /* Only allow bind mounts. */ > > + if (!(req->data.args[3] & MS_BIND)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* > > + * Ok, let's read the task's memory to see where they wanted their > > + * mount to go. > > + */ > > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/proc/%d/mem", req->pid); > > + mem = open(path, O_RDONLY); > > + if (mem < 0) { > > + perror("open mem"); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Now we avoid a TOCTOU: we referred to a pid by its pid, but since > > + * the pid that made the syscall may have died, we need to confirm that > > + * the pid is still valid after we open its /proc/pid/mem file. We can > > + * ask the listener fd this as follows. > > + * > > + * Note that this check should occur *after* any task-specific > > + * resources are opened, to make sure that the task has not died and > > + * we're not wrongly reading someone else's state in order to make > > + * decisions. > > + */ > > + if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ID_VALID, &req->id) < 0) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "task died before we could map its memory\n"); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Phew, we've got the right /proc/pid/mem. Now we can read it. Note > > + * that to avoid another TOCTOU, we should read all of the pointer args > > + * before we decide to allow the syscall. > > + */ > > + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[0], SEEK_SET) < 0) { > > + perror("seek"); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + ret = read(mem, source, sizeof(source)); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + perror("read"); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + if (lseek(mem, req->data.args[1], SEEK_SET) < 0) { > > + perror("seek"); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + ret = read(mem, target, sizeof(target)); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + perror("read"); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Our policy is to only allow bind mounts inside /tmp. This isn't very > > + * interesting, because we could do unprivlieged bind mounts with user > > + * namespaces already, but you get the idea. > > + */ > > + if (!strncmp(source, "/tmp", 4) && !strncmp(target, "/tmp", 4)) { > > Of course the host could have a /tmproot or somesuch, so you might want to > check the first 5 characters :) I manually bumped this to "/tmp/", 5 in both tests and applied it for -next -Kees -- Kees Cook