Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1338306imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:50:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/W7o5xqNNb9zF9g9zZ3Ff/zJ46keQy+hLmqqzWyzgJyFKhyjoWaDPWiomItj34QsGThxvX5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bf44:: with SMTP id u4mr18218475pls.5.1544579428921; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:50:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544579428; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=crLVHoHD9deMq/XOAJWLMpxhTet4XbKJuqxLxAvuBtofQavrQo0aqgLWvN8FHfR5rH QVByR//1GHzpILRT0GK1W8jTe9YFRWgmpnJMAewRme+Fu8/WwqBudDYqa80VXWPtSngk R1/84xFi7T9r+Ayl9uHjd04paSv9X9FcrGYFttoBBVZuFyPNUL3WBrdTQyajAmhJC06f hwZ5eVjB1ExYPCW7LN3Nl1HsT8hvhhhCYVKyAE9spG68DsQZC82bmVyEITm568ia3jfQ c6oWM2+DYpuMojkbGNGuqTe4CeQVHZ1qqhM8FcrcxFn4816L0TF5Pe1YlShREujmGH/6 fZxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=7P1XKUm1oMcExBJOz+s7Sebmjux12DHr2fgPkv+DQzU=; b=nODZzdP/bY5CPbYCK93S61bF37s9AUmOzbu9DOgL1O1rna0ciXsUSXR0yVcmC4wzwM cckgYmrhSgU4RGgVFun7E0kjGzzCJMzNUen+spdLaJ1vwkKjR1RmnXVbNpsD+TRCnFw5 LtuFmr9goA6yPR+xpOyteQBVOC32CODnQT2g9r3GtZRvvmKyhB8MknUY2pPwp5lESgNG LTgmV5qQQWFU7j3sejfLt/AR6Hgq1+F/FFNJfLuaBQEffYuMNPbaxrEFwju0ZBjoNxYf 2aulOscQHXXJ50MTMP3L7KqPD9kI0AH4y9jA6Vy3dvtcFRJjKGs6choX/ZPSRISqwrBd dlFw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f38si13257910pgf.206.2018.12.11.17.50.13; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:50:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726246AbeLLBtY (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:49:24 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:37150 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726201AbeLLBtY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:49:24 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Dec 2018 17:49:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,343,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="117869477" Received: from chenyu-desktop.sh.intel.com (HELO chenyu-desktop) ([10.239.160.132]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2018 17:49:22 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:56:57 +0800 From: Yu Chen To: joeyli Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lenny Szubowicz , Jacob Pan , Rui Zhang , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC v2] ACPI: acpi_pad: Do not launch acpi_pad threads on idle cpus Message-ID: <20181212015656.GA25427@chenyu-desktop> References: <1525521202-32519-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> <20181210063153.GO5327@linux-l9pv.suse> <20181211031220.GA23975@chenyu-desktop> <20181211083754.GE28555@linux-l9pv.suse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181211083754.GE28555@linux-l9pv.suse> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:37:54PM +0800, joeyli wrote: > Hi Yu Chen, > > Thanks for your response! > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:12:21AM +0800, Yu Chen wrote: > > Hi Joey, > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:31:53PM +0800, joeyli wrote: > > > Hi Chen Yu and ACPI experts, > > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 07:53:22PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote: > > > > According to current implementation of acpi_pad driver, > > > > it does not make sense to spawn any power saving threads > > > > on the cpus which are already idle - it might bring > > > > unnecessary overhead on these idle cpus and causes power > > > > waste. So verify the condition that if the number of 'busy' > > > > cpus exceeds the amount of the 'forced idle' cpus is met. > > > > This is applicable due to round-robin attribute of the > > > > power saving threads, otherwise ignore the setting/ACPI > > > > notification. > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Lenny Szubowicz > > > > Suggested-by: Len Brown > > > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > > > > Cc: Lenny Szubowicz > > > > Cc: Len Brown > > > > Cc: Jacob Pan > > > > Cc: Rui Zhang > > > > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu > > > > > > Do you have any news for this patch? Why it did not merged by kernel > > > maineline? > > > > > We are evaluating if this could be integrated into idle injection framework. > > May I know if there's any requirement/background from SUSE on this? > > > > I am also looking at your patch and idle injection framework. Currently I do not > have good suggestion for your patches yet. But I will try to ready my knowledge when > you send out new version. > Thanks. I mean, does SUSE get report from customers who encountered this issue? BTW, may I know the status of the encryption hibernation please?(Usin the TPM?) Best, Yu(Ryan) > Thanks a lot! > Joey Lee