Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1510879imu; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:29:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/X3LkQEoy0VIIOR3ufn0g5b03T251CnwFZneGtoPuHWoCuxQEFt/a63/0PEx9kt1GWK6ZFh X-Received: by 2002:a62:5a03:: with SMTP id o3mr18979726pfb.19.1544596192567; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:29:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544596192; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bcuJNoEtdxtKS4nY1LKvxlojXHWVDMR96gJXiJ+baK6Np0kPmDRLzsZ+9cJ7tnlA29 pzPhm+a/nXWp3vUvi3D1he0OX8weP3MggtHvQxtIyDRrOGKTVVxzwJ1/3wEswsh8YyIh uwdbTeqC01f+oh9J7+3Ih2OhgLR4rDn7f/lwt/3A7P5R4jOstvPBi1asBOgok6Blkt3E nNtOyrUkUH3K+FUeUaZ0nklpSmn7GGJ7pJ02JFIU0Qrqet6Km/edMuSAavMuXE13wzEl X0Hqpybq5rAS036l/qtjZ34+d/crz4kWyONzsld9UX1HIRl/Uq+EKzscdMilceFlT/Vp 9aLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ZRmzXqCIhnys+n0WDduCZmgYrUmpTh2H9E8iwHftF0g=; b=pdZenMZZV3NJgTGeZHoiH7xuk7imvuq1CEH3BoPK8q7X9LMDkOnbYe9uR/G7pdNVih z41pYHexTaaH8SfhM+V6osbOGZtFxxAnd5yt9ew/M5NjH/oL2OjiBPtQ4HLPP5u/4b8u ZI/vUcu8Ld6/0SbhGZkTTwPHuCW7lXgGMsZUY0WjQpMcOpJ96hCBmTsfD0YLM10WO53J NUuKGUi0FfNzHOhWHz2sEEyx5uaDzDRJ58WeLuCDg3dR/BnsLoa0lj59mcQXPjHfGUSc erw4xY4Cljsq57hbSW1MO3jvhsdAAQQ+9mhkZzr5hexhL8kwVjQdoG4HE1G7pGW2VQDn zUkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fFJPU4DE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 89si15139047pfr.242.2018.12.11.22.29.36; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fFJPU4DE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726482AbeLLG2r (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:28:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:42032 "EHLO mail-pl1-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726242AbeLLG2q (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:28:46 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id y1so8119968plp.9; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:28:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZRmzXqCIhnys+n0WDduCZmgYrUmpTh2H9E8iwHftF0g=; b=fFJPU4DEGjoUnsQbZcQc5c0H2j+ZU5rioR9xE5ath5vjhblWn6fV4MHM4aHXvmxiSo 9Y+qaRaVKatYwK51XsVooAs+uJSIfxpCwLt4o8EHJlVvmmpUWfyMrxxmzNob0x8i82+c TnL5SF2+6QdMAQsTlF2X7apvX2lz6NDC7xNexnjDy8or01LbQB/u3YAw6rcSl6A2sn+d +zM+FlRtw9XisuI0k9GLo4BdDw/9j/YemwDcbnyQ4Ei96mZG2yYCpzefc+ywei9TPYuP mVp2O+xGjqM7ADhGdXlP55DEWzq+qLmdIgv5S4YUk+2A8/grrRqE4CFVBmDpZmxrif9s /SsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZRmzXqCIhnys+n0WDduCZmgYrUmpTh2H9E8iwHftF0g=; b=DJ+hRQ+bq+UzTAWTxL+sCRV08mIcot9r5Lf1lV8JCREKEIFTg4hRpjTw9ivHzdoEAq yrQSJDr3UguI5vyHSIqAduN9W3sN3pud0LFobFy2JJ92sDPSbuY1aO2yg4Qum9/Jtm+X jkU4z3jz7YL4ia7ASuP7w5scTtRUR60EWw8A/GPVPgZ01GOmf2iAdkqsh6GmS57tqQFL z0kjZgiio7zHMIdWOF1e7vnfxc9cmRGxOynUPXRrz1Gv4BOdyhnJofXvFYUmxw/cP9SR xKaLJy7/wBAavSLWMe/yLVPu8oAeCc96fGh8bs+HmCw7tAw0luTdQbu2ra8umZ6Z0CPR ASVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYpPpsyzJlC1NgP1QK5R6VLi7Rvjc0M+zDU0J/X2XAc688WIYzI 3hzheZTjoK1YBh5a/y821KM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8e8a:: with SMTP id bg10mr18882029plb.192.1544596125706; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([211.246.69.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a90sm33542561pfj.109.2018.12.11.22.28.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:28:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:28:41 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Daniel Wang Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, Andrew Morton , byungchul.park@lge.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Mel Gorman , mhocko@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, Peter Zijlstra , tj@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , vbabka@suse.cz, Cong Wang , Peter Feiner Subject: Re: 4.14 backport request for dbdda842fe96f: "printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes" Message-ID: <20181212062841.GI431@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20181004074442.GA12879@jagdpanzerIV> <20181004083609.kcziz2ynwi2w7lcm@pathway.suse.cz> <20181004085515.GC12879@jagdpanzerIV> <20181022100952.GA1147@jagdpanzerIV> <20181109064740.GE599@jagdpanzerIV> <20181212052126.GF431@jagdpanzerIV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (12/11/18 22:08), Daniel Wang wrote: > > I've been meaning to try it but kept getting distracted by other > things. I'll try to find some time for it this week or next. Right now > my intent is to get Steven's patch into 4.14 stable as it evidently > fixed the particular issue I was seeing, and as Steven said it has > been in upstream since 4.16 so it's not like backporting it will raise > any red flags. I will start another thread on -stable for it. OK. > > I guess we still don't have a really clear understanding of what exactly > is going in your system > > I would also like to get to the bottom of it. Unfortunately I haven't > got the expertise in this area nor the time to do it yet. Hence the > intent to take a step back and backport Steven's patch to fix the > issue that has resurfaced in our production recently. No problem. I just meant that -stable people can be a bit "unconvinced". > Which two sets are you referring to specifically? I guess I used the wrong word: The first set (actually just one patch) is the one that makes consoles re-entrant from panic(). The other set - those 4 patches (Steven's patch, + Petr's patch + a patch that makes printk() atomic again). -ss