Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129063AbQKDOfy>; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:35:54 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129062AbQKDOfe>; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:35:34 -0500
Received: from green.nl.gxn.net ([62.100.30.36]:12505 "EHLO green.nl.gxn.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S129041AbQKDOfY>;
	Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:35:24 -0500
Message-Id: <m13s4Pi-000leyC@green.nl.gxn.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:38:15 +0100
From: Taco Witte <mail@tcwitte.myweb.nl>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: modular kernel
X-mailer: FoxMail 2.1 [en]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello

Some days ago, I read about the idea of a completely modular kernel.
I think it's a very good idea, because it would make it easier to get more
people work at the same moment, development would go faster. It would
be possible to make groups for a certain part of the kernel (for example
sound, or filesystems, or main) with own group pages with status info and
todo's and own mailinglists (it would divide this enourmous flow of mail
into smaller parts). It would decrease the download size. I believe it would
make bug tracking easier as well. I'm sure I forgot to mention something..

Regards,
Taco Witte


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/