Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:01:23 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, mingo@redhat.com,
        Mike Isely <isely@pobox.com>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
        keiichiw@chromium.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] media: usb: pwc: Don't use coherent DMA buffers
 for ISO transfer
Message-ID: <20181212090123.046ced92@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20181212085622.6b590540@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20181109190327.23606-1-matwey@sai.msu.ru>
        <20181109190327.23606-3-matwey@sai.msu.ru>
        <CAJs94Eb6Ev5O+Q_THYruxozSW2sTjWCrHhU8wciFNgYx7oCRuQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <CAJs94EYmRpUSnxzyt-8bdSwp3WgvOuqpt4b55wKQ41jDynFceg@mail.gmail.com>
        <CAJs94EbrOqdn5=xEnyQEC6aqYh=Wojh3-wGxT325f5Q7wnc36w@mail.gmail.com>
        <20181212085622.6b590540@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:56:22 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> Can someone please take this patch or at least say what's wrong with it
> if you have a problem?
> 
> Matwey has been patiently pinging us once every other week for over a
> month asking for a reply. I've already given my Reviewed-by from a
> tracing perspective.
> 
> Ignoring patches is not a friendly gesture.
> 

Nevermind, it appears that v5 is still under discussion.

Matwey, does v6 address the comments made in v5?

-- Steve