Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp312014imu; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 17:33:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XiCcWaGByrOGKkcIgO4359dz1muaH001Exr4C5ZYkVVtn9wPFtbzM44ZBbNOZ1uv+0xnQk X-Received: by 2002:a65:514c:: with SMTP id g12mr20096965pgq.169.1544664816922; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 17:33:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544664816; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HYsKEgLPptZMhLRX6+IR4Rtp/gHovISp05nb6ZQ6F/NtGCPfAccL4Vziyts66qO3G7 X0avktBwH6arD0Qtuf4nzi4t6KaeHdaCdbxjrf7SCVyHPPyVB2qRn/RGiZQV2n+x9brc lJt1X9nlL2TTVJAAkwJC1rQZW3JvkLgOGC8OG15vuPXix23XB1L510wRh8bCyMLynXxA xzjXUKFo0pBhdGkzvi2owLxu0jsYOZxdjFhuUwURCt4be8d8NK4xggOfpBlPefrI7n7w qleNaSIWAcIo399cAQRlHslw5yqY/mMT9GNaqxJNQf81hLHPZtRZHj7mNDVRJ0NQgMR4 dSSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=c+kAGz/pLcZ95ie3cmvcThYpdWgXdUopMzgkvb0mJKw=; b=ZiHufzS7rsEm8IFKrlv8v7Vs5BfFNDrhuS8BgSiGxMJVMDklPSQxXaVHY+2/L4BHup jesZCzG9TFA1318SxnL2zK11Z/f1ec9iE/re34EumPZdTI+IDv0FP7YVdETcNPdp97wr zg/ApUt/5GEXJmMjmVqDaODor4g8GOilPtYEkuSkO1ffet0Q83WQoVTHacAffEVD6PCK 6P4jeUhYN8072fX5HO+Ho6zWlYguzrtwc9Zs8bNyrJzI0SkFLbVFjHJTuVtwhBfFgjPT XA/4DC0XXaoVi2ZwIm357KnZBFHb/c3Xc6uo4kut2oQTVdBpgO+cOG3zQq8wQ3oA+Agd j3iQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b15si305711plm.431.2018.12.12.17.33.20; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 17:33:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726445AbeLMBNJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:13:09 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:57914 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726337AbeLMBNI (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:13:08 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42516809F; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 17:13:04 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Takashi Iwai , Peter Ujfalusi , Mark Brown , Sebastian Reichel , Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Graph fixes for using multiple endpoints per port Message-ID: <20181213011304.GL6707@atomide.com> References: <87wooga9an.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20181211141649.GL6707@atomide.com> <87ftv33bpg.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20181212001950.GX6707@atomide.com> <877egf33m9.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87k1kfs0u5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20181212152725.GE6707@atomide.com> <87imzy2sh1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20181213004009.GK6707@atomide.com> <87h8fi2qit.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h8fi2qit.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kuninori Morimoto [181213 01:06]: > > Hi Tony > > > > According to OF graph maintainer, he said that > > > counting port / endpoint are not guaranteed, > > > and we need to use "reg". > > > (It is the reason of b6f3fc005a2c8b425d7a0973b43bef05890bf479) > > > > > > If you could double checked, and we could agreed > > > that "reg" is the solution for us. > > > I will post patches. > > > > OK yes your "reg" proposal works for me. > > OK, thanks. > I will post patch-set, soon. OK sounds good to me. Thanks, Tony