Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp439284imu; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:57:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VPQmNZVGcVddMZRDl+Iy6MVPWSAjtI0sBJX2irjXZpfW0LZNTMgkDaOaGafgDkzqAfAlOB X-Received: by 2002:a63:6bc1:: with SMTP id g184mr21108237pgc.25.1544677043202; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:57:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544677043; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ImO1DJeZdaU06xLpQJNKlYbBmM7nN3T1zDo24yb1iEBxEqVUuwx4517wLwKT7GkA3G Vcs5TUxZ5RqnFNL7OQYHcMsqWLHqpnywI1OhRPPeyxMa4ZOaMaHFPnu3vFHxCbgxCrQd ppeKJs7Qd+YVpISRekiWnKQe25LvNih5CssI4X8Qr0otbxWj4w0CDTqx7usDhRd4Iy19 Wrd6zUZM3RMsTj01q5IhZaKr3cwR+lj2M+pkeZ2adu1oN4ykz4LdhC9M2UPQBspb0Jz5 eg+V0mz4SgBf3ISkE/KpGEGsbrXmWG9LmaFcw1JvHCSt4net8PElF+JB706XcLGX9JZm u+Yg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=ggBcb58Zwwau2IoCKb5GfdSuH6itNRNaTuwCPpBDmxI=; b=J9UWPQlY+KctkQ9rIlfWk4FNDUb9QVdWIz9m7veVrXoSg+1pIxgxlN+CEwLNVmHJQH Ld/kdCL658Z/8yJda7cvprkA8wv12EWXDfPclqb/1L4KZkEaocuFqevbMKIGVTw8OZvD ieZIBJv6/m1Bakw5i1nBdq6yl2HYHk7iU56pLfWHWMlAt4jpiuPsWW8DpGMSnU7NGzc9 cXEhWcEroblt6qX24tlazbe3lXsKLWT9zmZGkMMMfeGbhkpCPk3DSeBTovN8mLSUUT0F IhDML//HuxL10lwnsES3bPs/QeBZktiyoaOj79hCZenfqo2zqO+Nx6fvj2oqdKqE3zSc NLng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f124si732865pfa.1.2018.12.12.20.57.08; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:57:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726837AbeLMEzJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:55:09 -0500 Received: from mail-sh2.amlogic.com ([58.32.228.45]:19689 "EHLO mail-sh2.amlogic.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726599AbeLMEzJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:55:09 -0500 Received: from [10.18.29.207] (10.18.29.207) by mail-sh2.amlogic.com (10.18.11.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:55:25 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 3/4] clk: meson: add sub MMC clock controller driver To: Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong CC: Yixun Lan , Kevin Hilman , Carlo Caione , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Miquel Raynal , Boris Brezillon , Martin Blumenstingl , Liang Yang , Jian Hu , Qiufang Dai , Hanjie Lin , Victor Wan , , , , References: <1544457877-51301-1-git-send-email-jianxin.pan@amlogic.com> <1544457877-51301-4-git-send-email-jianxin.pan@amlogic.com> <10f2875c9724d9d9dd4bd32eab1fa3f8e42a809c.camel@baylibre.com> From: Jianxin Pan Message-ID: <11bb5068-2c93-a415-b295-6ca994621280@amlogic.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:55:25 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10f2875c9724d9d9dd4bd32eab1fa3f8e42a809c.camel@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.18.29.207] X-ClientProxiedBy: mail-sh2.amlogic.com (10.18.11.6) To mail-sh2.amlogic.com (10.18.11.6) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/12/12 0:59, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 00:04 +0800, Jianxin Pan wrote: >> From: Yixun Lan >> [...] >> >> +config COMMON_CLK_MMC_MESON >> + tristate "Meson MMC Sub Clock Controller Driver" >> + select MFD_SYSCON >> + select COMMON_CLK_AMLOGIC >> + select COMMON_CLK_AMLOGIC_AUDIO > > No it is wrong for the mmc to select AUDIO clocks. > If as a result of your patch sclk is needed for things, make the necessary > change in the Makefile. OK, I will add COMMON_CLK_AMLOGIC_SCLKDIV for sclk-div. > [...]>> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +#include "clkc.h" >> +#include "clkc-audio.h" > > Again having audio in the mmc controller is wrong. > Please make the necessary rework. Yes, I will split out sclk-div.h from clkc-audio.h in the next version. Thanks for your time. > >> + >> +/* clock ID used by internal driver */ >> +#define CLKID_MMC_MUX 0 >> + >> +#define SD_EMMC_CLOCK 0 > ^ > why the multiple space here ? this looks odd I will check the alignement in the whole patchset and fix them, Thank you. > >> +#define CLK_DELAY_STEP_PS 200 > > Please keep thing aligned aligned consistently. > >> + >> +#define MUX_CLK_NUM_PARENTS 2 >> +#define MMC_MAX_CLKS 5 >> + >> +struct mmc_clkc_data { >> + struct meson_clk_phase_delay_data tx; >> + struct meson_clk_phase_delay_data rx; > > Why use a tab above ? OK > >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clk_regmap_mux_data mmc_clkc_mux_data = { >> + .offset = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .mask = 0x3, >> + .shift = 6, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct meson_sclk_div_data mmc_clkc_div_data = { >> + .div = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = (0), >> + .width = (6), > > Please remove the unncessary parenthesis OK, I will remove them. > >> + }, >> + .hi = { >> + .width = 0, >> + }, > > structure is a static const, all non-list members will be zero > drop the OK, I will remove it in the next version. > >> + .flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct meson_clk_phase_data mmc_clkc_core_phase = { >> + .ph = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 8, >> + .width = 2, >> + } >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mmc_clkc_data mmc_clkc_gx_data = { >> + .tx = { >> + .phase = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 10, >> + .width = 2, >> + }, >> + .delay = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 16, >> + .width = 4, >> + }, > > Again, an effort on alignement would appreciated, same below OK, I will fix them. > >> + .delay_step_ps = CLK_DELAY_STEP_PS, >> + }, >> + .rx = { >> + .phase = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 12, >> + .width = 2, >> + }, >> + .delay = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 20, >> + .width = 4, >> + }, >> + .delay_step_ps = CLK_DELAY_STEP_PS, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mmc_clkc_data mmc_clkc_axg_data = { >> + .tx = { >> + .phase = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 10, >> + .width = 2, >> + }, >> + .delay = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 16, >> + .width = 6, >> + }, >> + .delay_step_ps = CLK_DELAY_STEP_PS, >> + }, >> + .rx = { >> + .phase = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 12, >> + .width = 2, >> + }, >> + .delay = { >> + .reg_off = SD_EMMC_CLOCK, >> + .shift = 22, >> + .width = 6, >> + }, >> + .delay_step_ps = CLK_DELAY_STEP_PS, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct of_device_id mmc_clkc_match_table[] = { >> + { >> + .compatible = "amlogic,gx-mmc-clkc", >> + .data = &mmc_clkc_gx_data >> + }, >> + { >> + .compatible = "amlogic,axg-mmc-clkc", >> + .data = &mmc_clkc_axg_data >> + }, >> + {} >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mmc_clkc_match_table); >> + >> +static struct clk_regmap * >> +mmc_clkc_register_clk(struct device *dev, struct regmap *map, >> + struct clk_init_data *init, >> + const char *suffix, void *data) >> +{ >> + struct clk_regmap *clk; >> + char *name; >> + int ret; >> + >> + clk = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*clk), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!clk) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + >> + name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s#%s", dev_name(dev), suffix); >> + if (!name) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + >> + init->name = name; >> + > > nitpick: remove this newline OK. > >> + clk->map = map; >> + clk->data = data; >> + clk->hw.init = init; >> + >> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &clk->hw); >> + if (ret) >> + clk = ERR_PTR(ret); >> + >> + kfree(name); >> + return clk; >> +} >> + >> +static struct clk_regmap *mmc_clkc_register_mux(struct device *dev, >> + struct regmap *map) >> +{ >> + const char *parent_names[MUX_CLK_NUM_PARENTS]; >> + struct clk_init_data init; >> + struct clk_regmap *mux; >> + struct clk *clk; >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < MUX_CLK_NUM_PARENTS; i++) { >> + char name[8]; >> + >> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "clkin%d", i); >> + clk = devm_clk_get(dev, name); >> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) { >> + if (clk != ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER)) >> + dev_err(dev, "Missing clock %s\n", name); >> + return ERR_PTR((long)clk); > > I don't think this cast is necessary ^ Yes, return clk is ok here. > >> + } >> + >> + parent_names[i] = __clk_get_name(clk); >> + } >> + >> + init.ops = &clk_regmap_mux_ops; >> + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT; >> + init.parent_names = parent_names; >> + init.num_parents = MUX_CLK_NUM_PARENTS; >> + >> + mux = mmc_clkc_register_clk(dev, map, &init, "mux", >> &mmc_clkc_mux_data); >> + if (IS_ERR(mux)) >> + dev_err(dev, "Mux clock registration failed\n"); >> + >> + return mux; >> +} >> + >> +static struct clk_regmap * >> +mmc_clkc_register_clk_with_parent(struct device *dev, struct regmap *map, >> + char *suffix, const struct clk_hw *hw, >> + unsigned long flags, >> + const struct clk_ops *ops, void *data) >> +{ >> + struct clk_init_data init; >> + struct clk_regmap *clk; >> + const char *parent_name = clk_hw_get_name(hw); >> + >> + init.ops = ops; >> + init.flags = flags; >> + init.parent_names = &parent_name; >> + init.num_parents = 1; >> + >> + clk = mmc_clkc_register_clk(dev, map, &init, suffix, data); >> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) >> + dev_err(dev, "Core %s clock registration failed\n", suffix); > > ^ > this function is not only called by the core clock, is it ? OK, I will drop "Core" in this line. > >> + >> + return clk; >> +} >> + >> +static int mmc_clkc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct clk_hw_onecell_data *onecell_data; >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + struct mmc_clkc_data *data; >> + struct regmap *map; >> + struct clk_regmap *clk, *core; >> + struct meson_sclk_div_data *div_data; >> + >> + /*cast to drop the const in match->data*/ >> + data = (struct mmc_clkc_data *)of_device_get_match_data(dev); >> + if (!data) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + map = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->of_node); >> + if (IS_ERR(map)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "could not find mmc clock controller\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR(map); >> + } >> + >> + onecell_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*onecell_data) + >> + sizeof(*onecell_data->hws) * MMC_MAX_CLKS, >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!onecell_data) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + clk = mmc_clkc_register_mux(dev, map); >> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) >> + return PTR_ERR(clk); >> + onecell_data->hws[CLKID_MMC_MUX] = &clk->hw, > > It does not really need to have an ID or be in the onecell data if you are not > going to expose it. On the other controllers, we are using the onecell for the > registration as well, which is why there is unexpeosed IDs, but it is not the > case here. > > ... and please, stop with this unnecessary tab. a space will do. same below. CLKID_MMC_MUX is an internal clock, and I will remove the ID and onecell date in the next version. And I will double check and fix tabs. Thank you. > >> + >> + div_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*div_data), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!div_data) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + *div_data = mmc_clkc_div_data; > > memcpy would be more appropriate. Sure. > >> + >> + clk = mmc_clkc_register_clk_with_parent(dev, map, "div", >> + &clk->hw, [...] > > > . >