Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1386676imu; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:18:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/ULHa9j+wBYIKbDMLkU/FAjYtOHWU7K17fHq0Uc/PdqJxD+Z9eGt6oEKeGyzzIUJWYlFCCR X-Received: by 2002:a63:d104:: with SMTP id k4mr485142pgg.227.1544739516927; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:18:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544739516; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=csV9iH+ZppzsWhXN64UN/Wu1wVaW6W3n17UlSALbcA4BP6XmW2h+qXgw1OWdhE2/7N elNaGxDgfAyFGVeJHzJrwBT09W7o0lsY+/bRCVaS1BiZm5B6YyTCZPAlCpijrrsLWmKH 8IcYWczN4gUkmdcpYId13gUHu10Um/cV34rfD1QG642dxx0l9nM1EDh/iCqPoONhKEd5 gavzlllAOXPdM2o8xw2IaQyNoJrCL+T+Wc2STRrcuq4lXHV0rEnDwfYBAqfirAWoelsq 3SCStrU84BCI2UzLF81J2ScN7fS2tyGNXQSVL8LFE+EfnUlzgc2uWAYzfPrykZV+dDER wz8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=UIwMCmoNNk050GzHFAVDHqtgO1fIXl7x2ZgM62ZKENc=; b=EVxLiSA2tbZ9kFZkwtT3mlo0xoOm+UXEXOhCGuQ4Qx/Yo5++SyAu+ZxFKUt8UA1zxO wmxe4suLSLrc/NP3UkKesSd9E51Ezts5SNQO351yDgeTZ0TZmY7qLcGh6/0UmXJBxnyq WKFrTcWDLLUe0AHjQzthRSQMNYZ2eJs2PIvnrRIQP2jvJUONxgdjD/aKnQBYSB91TU0x duFuqN5cXdRwjBcCveu0V7LeVPp2GSRezSxX5pTnv2prKDSDeXONzn0D3SiSY7qXGGil xorrUMrcUTHf0biN6i84/uds296xMg2c8yXBOoyI9Cr8SlADvON9Mm5EE5MXAwz/088W 8BXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y73si2305710pgd.478.2018.12.13.14.18.20; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:18:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727911AbeLMWR3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:17:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42116 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726461AbeLMWR1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:17:27 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A383084259; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from treble (ovpn-120-195.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.195]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9301057076; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:17:20 -0600 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Petr Mladek Cc: Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Jason Baron , Joe Lawrence , Evgenii Shatokhin , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 04/11] livepatch: Refuse to unload only livepatches available during a forced transition Message-ID: <20181213221720.5hs5ub2fosciqvxc@treble> References: <20181129094431.7801-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20181129094431.7801-5-pmladek@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181129094431.7801-5-pmladek@suse.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have trouble parsing the subject. How about? How about: Don't block the removal of patches loaded after a forced transition Or Track 'forced' on a per-patch basis ? -- Josh