Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265715AbUAUT61 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:58:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266147AbUAUT60 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:58:26 -0500 Received: from delerium.codemonkey.org.uk ([81.187.208.145]:18073 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265715AbUAUT6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:58:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:56:56 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts Message-ID: <20040121195656.GF9327@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel References: <20040121194315.GE9327@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 747 Lines: 22 On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:56:02AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > *sigh*, anyone object to patches marking such mailing lists in > > MAINTAINERS as 'subscription only' ? > > Sounds like they shouldn't be in MAINTAINERS at all if they can't be > posted to. I mean, what's the point? I see the point of having a 'this is our mailing list' entry, but having that as the sole contact point when its a closed list is damned rude IMO. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/