Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266083AbUAUUET (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:04:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266093AbUAUUET (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:04:19 -0500 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:39296 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266083AbUAUUEO (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:04:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:12:15 GMT From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200401212012.i0LKCF3l001527@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20040121195656.GF9327@redhat.com> References: <20040121194315.GE9327@redhat.com> <20040121195656.GF9327@redhat.com> Subject: Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 939 Lines: 25 Quote from Dave Jones : > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:56:02AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > > *sigh*, anyone object to patches marking such mailing lists in > > > MAINTAINERS as 'subscription only' ? > > > > Sounds like they shouldn't be in MAINTAINERS at all if they can't be > > posted to. I mean, what's the point? > > I see the point of having a 'this is our mailing list' entry, > but having that as the sole contact point when its a closed list > is damned rude IMO. Quite possibly some lists weren't closed when they were first added to the MAINTAINERS file, but have since become closed. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/